Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30945049›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Tumor control and survival in patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: a retrospective analysis.

Matthew I Ehrlich, Elliot Schiff, Jonathan P S Knisely, Jenghwa Chang, Xin Qian, Anuj Goenka, Michael Schulder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Construction of a survival prediction model and analysis of influencing factors for brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer based on multi‑parameter clinical data.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew I EhrlichDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7379-6244
Elliot SchiffDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Jonathan P S KniselyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Jenghwa ChangDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Xin QianDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Anuj GoenkaDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Michael SchulderDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA. mschulder@northwell.edu.
Hofstra University · USCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo assess tumor control and survival in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for 10 or more metastatic brain tumors.

methodsPatients were retrospectively identified. Clinical records were reviewed for follow-up data, and post-treatment MRI studies were used to assess tumor control. For tumor control studies, patients were separated based on synchronous or metachronous treatment, and control was assessed at 3-month intervals. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to create survival curves, and regression analyses were employed to study the effects of several variables.

resultsFifty-five patients were treated for an average of 17 total metastases. Forty patients received synchronous treatment, while 15 received metachronous treatment. Univariate analysis revealed an association between larger brain volumes irradiated with 12 Gy and decreased overall survival (p = 0.0406); however, significance was lost on multivariate analysis. Among patients who received synchronous treatment, the median percentage of tumors controlled was 100%, 91%, and 82% at 3, 6, and 9 months, respectively. Among patients who received metachronous treatment, the median percentage of tumors controlled after each SRS encounter was 100% at all three time points.

conclusionsSRS can be used to treat patients with 10 or more total brain metastases with an expectation of tumor control and overall survival that is equivalent to that reported for patients with four or fewer tumors. Development of new metastases leading to repeat SRS is not associated with worsened tumor control or survival. Survival may be adversely affected in patients having a higher volume of normal brain irradiated.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBrain metastasesGamma knifeStereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID30945049
OpenAlexW2934623418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.