ReviewInsights into imaging2019
The elbow: review of anatomy and common collateral ligament complex pathology using MRI.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Deep learning for radiographic differentiation between lateral malleolar avulsion fractures and subfibular ossicles.iScience · 2026Article
- Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging findings in symptomatic minor instability of the lateral elbow: A cross-specialty evaluation.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Return to Sport Following Elbow Dislocation: A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- Congruence angle and medial ulnar translation: a novel measurement to assess the severity of ligament injury in simple elbow dislocation.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Review
- CT Arthrography of the Elbow: What Radiologists Should Know.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
- Acute combined collateral ligaments injury of the elbow without any fracture or dislocation-a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2022Article
- LUCL reconstruction of the elbow: clinical midterm results based on the underlying pathogenesis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Article
- MRI in acute simple elbow dislocations: correlation of preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings of collateral ligaments and associated soft tissue injuries.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2022Article
- 3D isotropic spine echo MR imaging of elbow: How it helps surgical decisions.European journal of radiology open · 2022Review
- Hidden instability in posttraumatic stiff elbows.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021Article
- Evaluation and management of elbow injuries in the adolescent overhead athlete.SAGE open medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The elbow is a complex joint whose stability is imparted by osseous and soft-tissue constraints. Anatomical and biomechanical knowledge of the supporting structures that provide stability to the medial and lateral elbow is essential to correctly interpret the pathological findings. Conventional MRI and MR arthrography are the imaging modalities of choice in the evaluation of elbow ligament injuries. Elbow instability can be classified according to timing (acute, chronic, or recurrent), the direction of displacement, the degree of displacement, and the articulations involved. This article reviews the MR imaging protocols recommended for each diagnosis and the normal anatomy and biomechanical aspects of the medial and lateral collateral ligament complex. We also present multiple cases of typical and atypical patterns of injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.