Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30945005›Full record

SynthesisCurrent hypertension reports2019

Sexual Dysfunction in Women with Hypertension: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Larissa Marques Santana, Lisiane Perin, Rosana Lunelli, José Francisco Secorun Inácio, Clarissa Garcia Rodrigues, Bruna Eibel, Silvia Goldmeier

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current hypertension reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sexual Dysfunction in Patients with Chronic Non-Genital Physical Disease: An Umbrella Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Larissa Marques SantanaUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFSCPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Lisiane PerinInstituto de Cardiologia do RS - Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC-FUC), Av. Princesa Isabel, 370, 3rd floor, Bairro Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, 90620-000, Brazil.
Rosana LunelliInstituto de Cardiologia do RS - Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC-FUC), Av. Princesa Isabel, 370, 3rd floor, Bairro Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, 90620-000, Brazil.
José Francisco Secorun InácioInstituto de Cardiologia do RS - Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC-FUC), Av. Princesa Isabel, 370, 3rd floor, Bairro Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, 90620-000, Brazil.
Clarissa Garcia RodriguesInstituto de Cardiologia do RS - Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC-FUC), Av. Princesa Isabel, 370, 3rd floor, Bairro Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, 90620-000, Brazil.
Bruna EibelInstituto de Cardiologia do RS - Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC-FUC), Av. Princesa Isabel, 370, 3rd floor, Bairro Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, 90620-000, Brazil.
Silvia GoldmeierInstituto de Cardiologia do RS - Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC-FUC), Av. Princesa Isabel, 370, 3rd floor, Bairro Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, 90620-000, Brazil. pesquisa.sgold@gmail.com.
Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia · BRUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe aimed to evaluate the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in hypertensive women and compare sexual dysfunction between hypertensive and non-hypertensive women. RECENT

findingsConducted a systematic review in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, IBECS, and Lilacs. We included articles evaluating the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in a woman and/or comparing sexual dysfunction between hypertensive and non-hypertensive women. Studies were excluded if they evaluated patients with secondary hypertension, examined sexual dysfunction caused by drugs, did not distinguish by gender, or included patients with hypertension and other comorbidities/pathologies. We conducted an I

Indexed as

HypertensionSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalComorbidityFemaleHumansPrevalenceRiskHypertensionMeta-analysisPsychologicalSexual dysfunctionsSexualitySystolicWomen

Identifiers

PMID30945005
OpenAlexW2931527015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.