ReviewMDM policy & practice
The Challenges of Informed Consent in High-Stakes, Randomized Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review.
Review in MDM policy & practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06059599 (Active Informed Consent), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Active Informed Consent: a New Solution to Improve and Objectively Test the Patient Understanding of Complex Surgical Procedures Proposals
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Parental Views of Facilitators and Barriers to Research Participation: Systematic Review.Pediatrics · 2023Pooled it
- Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- E-Consent-a guide to maintain recruitment in clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic.Trials · 2022Trial
- How to improve informed consent processes in clinical trials with cancer patients: a qualitative analysis of multidisciplinary experts' perspectives.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- An asynchronous electronic consent for improving consent in research among patients with cancer.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Informed consent and risk communication challenges in antimicrobial clinical trials: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Simplifying informed consent as a universal precaution.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Readability and Comprehension of Anesthesia Informed Consent Forms in a Spanish County Hospital: An Observational Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Improving patient satisfaction based on service quality in clinical trials: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Social Determinants of Health and Informed Consent Comprehension for Pediatric Cancer Clinical Trials.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Disclosing Conflicts of Interest to Potential Research Participants: Good for Nothing?Ethics & human research · 2023Article
- Article
- Characterization of key information sections in informed consent forms posted on ClinicalTrials.gov.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Consumer perspectives on simplified, layered consent for a low risk, but complex pragmatic trial.Trials · 2022Article
- Using provocative design to foster electronic informed consent innovation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Creating concise and readable patient information sheets for interventional studies in Australia: are we there yet?Trials · 2022Article
- Four reasons why too many informed consents to clinical research are invalid: a critical analysis of current practices.BMJ open · 2022Review
- Expectations, experiences and preferences of patients and physicians in the informed consent process for clinical trials in oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Laboratory Reference Ranges and Testing Intervals Work Group.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Review
- Informed consent: Old and new challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.