Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30944758›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastric cancer2019

Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Testing of the Perigastric Vagus Nerve Branches to Evaluate Viability and Signals along Nerve Pathways during Gastrectomy.

Seong-Ho Kong, Sung Min Kim, Dong-Gun Kim, Kee Hong Park, Yun-Suhk Suh, Tae-Han Kim, Il Jung Kim, Jeong-Hwa Seo, Young Jin Lim, Hyuk-Joon Lee and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastric cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Preservation of hepatic branch of the vagus nerve reduces the risk of gallstone formation after gastrectomy.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Seong-Ho KongDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3929-796X
Sung Min KimDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Dong-Gun KimDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Kee Hong ParkDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Yun-Suhk SuhDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-8482
Tae-Han KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Il Jung KimDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Jeong-Hwa SeoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Young Jin LimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Hyuk-Joon LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7624-2020
Han-Kwang YangDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3495-3048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe perigastric vagus nerve may play an important role in preserving function after gastrectomy, and intraoperative neurophysiologic tests might represent a feasible method of evaluating the vagus nerve. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of neurophysiologic evaluations of the function and viability of perigastric vagus nerve branches during gastrectomy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirteen patients (1 open total gastrectomy, 1 laparoscopic total gastrectomy, and 11 laparoscopic distal gastrectomy) were prospectively enrolled. The hepatic and celiac branches of the vagus nerve were exposed, and grabbing type stimulation electrodes were applied as follows: 10-30 mA intensity, 4 trains, 1,000 µs/train, and 5× frequency. Visible myocontractile movement and electrical signals were monitored via needle probes before and after gastrectomy. Gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 weeks and 3 months, respectively.

resultsResponses were observed after stimulating the celiac branch in 10, 9, 10, and 6 patients in the antrum, pylorus, duodenum, and proximal jejunum, respectively. Ten patients responded to hepatic branch stimulation at the duodenum. After vagus-preserving distal gastrectomy, 2 patients lost responses to the celiac branch at the duodenum and jejunum (1 each), and 1 patient lost response to the hepatic branch at the duodenum. Significant procedure-related complications and meaningful postoperative diarrhea were not observed.

conclusionsIntraoperative neurophysiologic testing seems to be a feasible methodology for monitoring the perigastric vagus nerves. Innervation of the duodenum via the celiac branch and postoperative preservation of the function of the vagus nerves were confirmed in most patients.

trial registrationClinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0000823.

Indexed as

GastrectomyIntraoperative neurophysiological monitoringVagus nerve

Identifiers

PMID30944758
PMCPMC6441774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.