Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30944580›Full record

ArticleNature geoscience2017

Microbial substrate preference dictated by energy demand, not supply.

Maximiliano J Amenabar, Everett L Shock, Eric E Roden, John W Peters, Eric S Boyd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature geoscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bioenergetics of aerobic and anaerobic growth ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Mechanisms of Mineral Substrate Acquisition in a Thermoacidophile.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maximiliano J AmenabarDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana.
Everett L ShockSchool of Earth & Space Exploration and School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Eric E RodenDepartment of Geosciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
John W PetersDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana.
Eric S BoydDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana.
Montana State University · USNASA Astrobiology Institute · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

NASA NNX13AI11G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growth substrates that maximize energy yield are widely thought to be utilized preferentially by microorganisms. However, observed distributions of microorganisms and their activities often deviate from predictions based solely on thermodynamic considerations of substrate energy supply. Here we present observations of the bioenergetics and growth yields of a metabolically flexible, thermophilic strain of the archaeon

Identifiers

PMID30944580
PMCPMC6443248
OpenAlexW2730296698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.