ArticleScientific reports2019
When the statistical MMN meets the physical MMN.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Precise Is Predictive Coding for Things We Hear? Mismatch Negativity With Shepard Tones.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Not All Rules Are Equal: Rare Conditional Rules Shape Behaviour but Yield to Global Probability in Passive Listening.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neural tracking of auditory statistical regularities in adults with and without dyslexia.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Seeking the neural representation of statistical properties in print during implicit processing of visual words.NPJ science of learning · 2023Article
- Markov chains as a proxy for the predictive memory representations underlying mismatch negativity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Order of statistical learning depends on perceptive uncertainty.Current research in neurobiology · 2023Article
- Brain-correlates of processing local dependencies within a statistical learning paradigm.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Linking the neural basis of distributional statistical learning with transitional statistical learning: The paradox of attention.Neuropsychologia · 2022Article
- Relevance to the higher order structure may govern auditory statistical learning in neonates.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Electrophysiological and behavioral indicators of musical knowledge about unfamiliar music.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Unpredictability of the "when" influences prediction error processing of the "what" and "where".PloS one · 2022Article
- Learning Words While Listening to Syllables: Electrophysiological Correlates of Statistical Learning in Children and Adults.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
- Dynamics of nonlinguistic statistical learning: From neural entrainment to the emergence of explicit knowledge.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Statistical Properties of Musical Creativity: Roles of Hierarchy and Uncertainty in Statistical Learning.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Not All Words Are Equally Acquired: Transitional Probabilities and Instructions Affect the Electrophysiological Correlates of Statistical Learning.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How do listeners respond to prediction errors within patterned sequence of sounds? To answer this question we carried out a statistical learning study using electroencephalography (EEG). In a continuous auditory stream of sound triplets the deviations were either (a) statistical, in terms of transitional probability, (b) physical, due to a change in sound location (left or right speaker) or (c) a double deviants, i.e. a combination of the two. Statistical and physical deviants elicited a statistical mismatch negativity and a physical MMN respectively. Most importantly, we found that effects of statistical and physical deviants interacted (the statistical MMN was smaller when co-occurring with a physical deviant). Results show, for the first time, that processing of prediction errors due to statistical learning is affected by prediction errors due to physical deviance. Our findings thus show that the statistical MMN interacts with the physical MMN, implying that prediction error processing due to physical sound attributes suppresses processing of learned statistical properties of sounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.