Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30944354›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Characterization of transgenic mouse lines for labeling type I and type II afferent neurons in the cochlea.

Pankhuri Vyas, Jingjing Sherry Wu, Adrian Jimenez, Elisabeth Glowatzki, Paul Albert Fuchs

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Developmental Changes inFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  11. Nitric Oxide Signaling in the Auditory Pathway.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Review
  12. Effects of Calcitonin-Gene-Related-Peptide on Auditory Nerve Activity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Aspects of the Development and Function of Auditory Neurons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Serotonergic modulation across sensory modalities.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pankhuri VyasThe Center for Hearing and Balance, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3585-8851
Jingjing Sherry WuThe Center for Hearing and Balance, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9625-1661
Adrian JimenezThe Center for Hearing and Balance, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Elisabeth GlowatzkiThe Center for Hearing and Balance, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. eglowat2@jhmi.edu.
Paul Albert FuchsThe Center for Hearing and Balance, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. pfuchs1@jhmi.edu.

Funding

The Histology CoreP30DC005211 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, ERIC DANIEL · 2002 to 2016
$9.1M
AFFERENT SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION IN THE MAMMALIAN COCHLEAR01DC006476 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GLOWATZKI, ELISABETH · 2004 to 2022
$6.4M
Type II Afferents and Cochlear DamageR01DC016559 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ELISABETH GLOWATZKI · 2017 to 2026
$4.9M
Synaptic mechanisms underlying vestibular nerve fiber activityR01DC012957 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GLOWATZKI, ELISABETH · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005211NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006476NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012957NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cochlea is innervated by type I and type II afferent neurons. Type I afferents are myelinated, larger diameter neurons that send a single dendrite to contact a single inner hair cell, whereas unmyelinated type II afferents are fewer in number and receive input from many outer hair cells. This strikingly differentiated innervation pattern strongly suggests specialized functions. Those functions could be investigated with specific genetic markers that enable labeling and manipulating each afferent class without significantly affecting the other. Here three mouse models were characterized and tested for specific labeling of either type I or type II cochlear afferents. Nos1

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCochleaGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHair Cells, Auditory, OuterMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMyelin SheathNerve FibersNeurons, AfferentNitric Oxide Synthase Type IReceptors, Dopamine D2Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsBiomarkersDRD2 protein, mouseGreen Fluorescent ProteinsNitric Oxide Synthase Type INos1 protein, mouseReceptors, Dopamine D2Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsSlc6a4 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID30944354
PMCPMC6447598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.