Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30944142›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol, combined or not with use of a bundle of new devices, for prevention of short-term peripheral venous catheter-related infectious complications and catheter failure: an open-label, single-centre, randomised, four-parallel group, two-by-two factorial trial: CLEAN 3 protocol study.

Jérémy Guenezan, Bertrand Drugeon, Rodérick O'Neill, Diane Caillaud, Clément Sénamaud, Catherine Pouzet, Sabrina Seguin, Denis Frasca, Olivier Mimoz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03757143 (Skin Antisepsis With Chlorhexidine-Alcohol Versus Povidone Iodine-Alcohol, Combined or Not With Use of a Bundle of New Devices, for Prevention of Intravascular-catheter Colonization and Catheter Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03757143 phase4completednot on this map

Skin Antisepsis With Chlorhexidine-Alcohol Versus Povidone Iodine-Alcohol, Combined or Not With Use of a Bundle of New Devices, for Prevention of Intravascular-catheter Colonization and Catheter Failure: An Open Label, Single Center, Randomized Controlled, Two-by-two Factorial Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoitiers University HospitalRan2019 to 2019Enrolled1,000ConditionsIntravascular-catheter Colonization, Catheter FailureArmsPovidone-Iodine-Alcohol, Chlorhexidine-Alcohol, Insyte Autoguard BC Winged, Nexiva single port catheter, MaxZero needless connector, PureHub Deinfecting Caps and Posiflush prefilled saline syringes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jérémy GuenezanEmergency Department and Prehospital Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Bertrand DrugeonEmergency Department and Prehospital Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Rodérick O'NeillEmergency Department and Prehospital Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Diane CaillaudEmergency Department and Prehospital Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Clément SénamaudEmergency Department and Prehospital Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Catherine PouzetEmergency Department and Prehospital Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Sabrina SeguinIntensive Care Unit and Emergency Department and Prehospital Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Denis FrascaMethods in Patient-Centered Outcomes and Health Research, INSERM UMR1246, Poitiers, France.
Olivier MimozEmergency Department and Prehospital Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1737-7915
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionShort peripheral intravenous catheters (PVCs) are the most frequently used invasive medical devices in hospitals. Unfortunately, PVCs often fail before the end of treatment due to the occurrence of mechanical, vascular or infectious complications, which prolongs hospitalisation and increases healthcare costs and mortality.Prevention of these complications is mainly based on the respect of hygiene rules and the use of biocompatible catheters. In critically ill patients, 2% chlorhexidine-alcohol is superior to 5% povidone iodine-alcohol for skin preparation before central venous and arterial catheters; whether this finding can be extended to PVC inserted in the wards remains speculative. Similarly, the use of new technologies such as catheters designed to minimise blood exposure, zero-reflux needleless connectors, disinfecting caps and flushing PVCs before and after each medication administration to maintain catheter patency are of theoretical interest to prevent PVC failure, but little scientific data support their routine use. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CLEAN 3 study is an open-label, single-centre, randomised, two-by-two factorial trial. One thousand patients visiting our emergency department and requiring hospital admission in the wards will be randomised to one of four strategies according to skin preparation and devices used. The two primary endpoints will be (1) the incidence of infectious complications related to the catheters (colonisation, local infection or bloodstream infection) and (2) the time between catheter insertion and catheter failure defined as any premature removal of PVC before end of treatment, other than for routine replacement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by an independent ethics committee and will be carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2018-A02535-50; NCT03757143.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Infective Agents, LocalAntisepsisCatheterization, PeripheralCatheter-Related InfectionsCatheters, IndwellingCentral Venous CathetersChlorhexidineEquipment FailureEthanolFemaleHumansIncidenceLength of StayMaleAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineEthanolPovidone-Iodineantisepticshealthcare-associated infectionmedical devicesprevention

Identifiers

PMID30944142
PMCPMC6500304
OpenAlexW2932238586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.