Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30944135›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2019

Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder.

Jan Klimas, Lauren Gorfinkel, Salvatore M Giacomuzzi, Christian Ruckes, M Eugenia Socías, Nadia Fairbairn, Evan Wood

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Management of opioid use disorder: 2024 update to the national clinical practice guideline.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Clinical guideline for homeless and vulnerably housed people, and people with lived homelessness experience.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Effect of TRV130 and methadone on fentanyl-vs.-food choice and somatic withdrawal signs in opioid-dependent and post-opioid-dependent rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jan KlimasBC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5179-0052
Lauren GorfinkelColumbia University, New York, USA.
Salvatore M GiacomuzziUniversitätsklinik Innsbruck-Ambulanz für Abhängigkeitserkrankungen, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian RuckesUniversity Medical Center Mainz, Interdisciplinary Center Clinical Trials, Mainz, Germany.
M Eugenia SocíasBC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada.
Nadia FairbairnBC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada.
Evan WoodBC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CABritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use · CAColumbia University · USJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

Mentoring the next generation of addiction clinician scientists while responding to the opioid epidemicR25DA037756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI FAIRBAIRN, NADIA · 2014 to 2023
$3.6M
CIHR SMN–139148NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA037756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the efficacy of slow release oral morphine (SROM) as a treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD).

designSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: Three electronic databases were searched through 1 May 2018: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We also searched the following electronic registers for ongoing trials: ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Current Controlled Trials and the EU Clinical Trials Register. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included RCTs of all durations, assessing the effect of SROM on measures of treatment retention, heroin use and craving in adults who met the diagnostic criteria for OUD. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data were pooled using the random-effects model and expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed (χ

resultsAmong 1315 records screened and four studies reviewed, four unique randomised trials met the inclusion criteria (n=471), and compared SROM with methadone. In the meta-analysis, we observed no significant differences between SROM and methadone in improving treatment retention

conclusionsMeta-analysis of existing randomised trials suggests SROM may be generally equal to methadone in retaining patients in treatment and reducing heroin use while potentially resulting in less craving. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was low-to-moderate.

Indexed as

MethadoneMorphineNarcoticsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAdministration, OralDelayed-Action PreparationsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDelayed-Action PreparationsMethadoneMorphineNarcoticsmeta-analysisopioid use disorderoral morphinesubstance misusesubstance use treatment

Identifiers

PMID30944135
PMCPMC6500187
OpenAlexW2931545531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.