Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30944044›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

An individualised versus a conventional pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy during colorectal laparoscopic surgery: rationale and study protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical study.

O Diaz-Cambronero, G Mazzinari, C L Errando, M J Schultz, B Flor Lorente, N García-Gregorio, M Vila Montañés, Daniel Robles-Hernández, L E Olmedilla Arnal, A Martín-De-Pablos and 3 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02773173 (Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure in Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Standard Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02773173 phase4completednot on this map

Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure in Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Standard Therapy (IPPCollapse II)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La FeRan2017 to 2018Enrolled204ConditionsColorectal Surgery, LaparoscopyArmsIPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgery, SPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

O Diaz-CambroneroDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain. perioperativemedicine@iislafe.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3170-7709
G MazzinariPerioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS laFe), Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
C L ErrandoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
M J SchultzDepartment of Intensive Care & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
B Flor LorenteDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
N García-GregorioDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
M Vila MontañésDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Daniel Robles-HernándezDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
L E Olmedilla ArnalDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
A Martín-De-PablosDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
A Marqués MaríPerioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS laFe), Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
M P Argente NavarroDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
IPPCollapse-II study group

Funding

Merck Investigator Studies Program Review Committee (MISP-RC), Merck Sharp & Dohme protocol code #53607 with $109,672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA recent study shows that a multifaceted strategy using an individualised intra-abdominal pressure titration strategy during colorectal laparoscopic surgery results in an acceptable workspace at low intra-abdominal pressure in most patients. The multifaceted strategy, focused on lower to individualised intra-abdominal pressures, includes prestretching the abdominal wall during initial insufflation, deep neuromuscular blockade, low tidal volume ventilation settings and a modified lithotomy position. The study presented here tests the hypothesis that this strategy improves outcomes of patients scheduled for colorectal laparoscopic surgery.

methodsThe Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure in Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery versus Standard Therapy (IPPCollapse-II) study is a multicentre, two-arm, parallel-group, single-blinded randomised 1:1 clinical study that runs in four academic hospitals in Spain. Patients scheduled for colorectal laparoscopic surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I to III who are aged > 18 years and are without cognitive deficits are randomised to an individualised pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy (the intervention group) or to a conventional pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy (the control group). The primary outcome is recovery assessed with the Post-operative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS) at postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes include PQRS score in the post anaesthesia care unit and at postoperative day 3, postoperative complications until postoperative day 28, hospital length of stay and process-related outcomes. DISCUSSION: The IPPCollapse-II study will be the first randomised clinical study that assesses the impact of an individualised pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy focused on working with the lowest intra-abdominal pressure during colorectal laparoscopic surgery on relevant patient-centred outcomes. The results of this large study, to be disseminated through conference presentations and publications in international peer-reviewed journals, are of ultimate importance for optimising the care and safety of laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Selection of patient-reported outcomes as the primary outcome of this study facilitates the translation into clinical practice. Access to source data will be made available through anonymised datasets upon request and after agreement of the Steering Committee of the IPPCollapse-II study.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02773173 . Registered on 16 May 2016. EudraCT, 2016-001693-15. Registered on 8 August 2016.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyColonDigestive System Surgical ProceduresHumansLength of StayMulticenter Studies as TopicPneumoperitoneum, ArtificialPostoperative ComplicationsPressureRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionRectumSingle-Blind MethodSpainTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAbdominal laparoscopyColorectal surgeryOutcomePneumoperitoneum pressurePostoperative complicationsPost-operative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS)Safety

Identifiers

PMID30944044
PMCPMC6446296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.