Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30944015›Full record

SynthesisArthritis research & therapy2019

Survival and prognosis factors in systemic sclerosis: data of a French multicenter cohort, systematic review, and meta-analysis of the literature.

M R Pokeerbux, J Giovannelli, L Dauchet, L Mouthon, C Agard, J C Lega, Y Allanore, P Jego, B Bienvenu, S Berthier and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Arthritis research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Sclerosing diseases of the skin.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Review
  12. [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

M R PokeerbuxUniversity of Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, F-59000, Lille, France.
J GiovannelliUniversity of Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, F-59000, Lille, France.
L DauchetInserm UMR1167, RID-AGE, Risk Factors and Molecular Determinants of Aging-Related Diseases, Université de Lille, Centre Hosp. Univ Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, Lille, France.
L MouthonService de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Cochin, Centre de Référence pour les Maladies Systémiques Autoimmunes Rares d'Ile de France, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
C AgardCHU Nantes, Service de Médecine Interne, Nantes, France.
J C LegaDepartment of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Y AllanoreHôpital Cochin-APHP-Service de Rhumatologie A, Université Paris Descartes, INSERM U1016, Paris, France.
P JegoINSERM U 1085 (IRSET), University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
B BienvenuService de Médecine Interne CHU Caen, Caen, France.
S BerthierService de Médecine Interne et Immunologie Clinique, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France.
A MekinianHôpital Saint-Antoine-APHP-Service de Médecine Interne, Paris, France.
E HachullaUniversity of Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, F-59000, Lille, France.
D LaunayUniversity of Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, F-59000, Lille, France. launayd@gmail.com.
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive · FRLille Inflammation Research International Center · FRUniversité de Lille · FRUniversité Lille Nord de France · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on survival and prognosis factors in incident cohorts are scarce in systemic sclerosis (SStc). To describe survival, standardized mortality ratio (SMR), and prognosis factors in systemic sclerosis (SSc), we analyzed a multicenter French cohort of incident patients and performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

methodsA multicenter, French cohort study was conducted between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2013. Patients were followed-up until July 1, 2016. A systematic review of the literature was carried out in MEDLINE and EMBASE up to July 2017. Meta-analysis was performed using all available data on SMR and hazard ratios of prognosis factors.

resultsA total of 625 patients (493 females, 446 lcSSc) were included. During the study period, 104 deaths (16.6%) were recorded and 133 patients were lost to follow-up. Overall survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years from diagnosis were 98.0%, 92.5%, 85.9%, and 71.7% respectively in the French cohort. Overall SMR was 5.73 (95% CI 4.68-6.94). Age at diagnosis > 60 years, diffuse cutaneous SSc, scleroderma renal crisis, dyspnea, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), forced vital capacity < 70%, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide < 70%, pulmonary hypertension (PH), telangiectasia, valvular disease, malignancy, anemia, and CRP > 8 mg/l were associated with a poorer survival after adjustment. Eighteen studies (11,719 patients) were included in the SMR meta-analysis and 36 studies (26,187 patients) in the prognosis factor analysis. Pooled SMR was 3.45 (95%CI 3.03-3.94). Age at disease onset, male sex, African origin, diffuse cutaneous SSc, anti-Scl70 antibodies, cardiac and renal involvement, interstitial lung disease, PH, and malignancy were significantly associated with a worse prognosis. Anti-centromere antibodies were associated with a better survival.

conclusionsOverall, our study highlights a high mortality rate in SSc patients and confirms previously described prognosis factors related to skin extension and organ involvement while identifying additional prognosis factors such as autoantibody status, telangiectasia, 6MWD, and valvular disease.

Indexed as

Multicenter Studies as TopicAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleFranceHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisScleroderma, DiffuseScleroderma, SystemicSurvival RateMeta-analysisPrognosis factorsSurvivalSystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID30944015
PMCPMC6446383
OpenAlexW2947998848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.