Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30944013›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2019

Death after awakening from post-anoxic coma: the "Best CPC" project.

Fabio Silvio Taccone, Janneke Horn, Christian Storm, Alain Cariou, Claudio Sandroni, Hans Friberg, Cornelia Astrid Hoedemaekers, Mauro Oddo

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik, 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. ftaccone@ulb.ac.be.
Janneke HornDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christian StormMedical Department, Division of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Alain CariouIntensive Care Unit, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Descartes University, Paris, France.
Claudio SandroniDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Hans FribergDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Cornelia Astrid HoedemaekersDepartment of Intensive Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Mauro OddoDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEErasmus Hospital · BELund University · SERadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients who recover consciousness after cardiac arrest (CA), a subsequent death from non-neurological causes may confound the assessment of long-term neurological outcome. We investigated the prevalence and causes of death after awakening (DAA) in a multicenter cohort of CA patients.

methodsObservational multicenter cohort study on patients resuscitated from CA in eight European intensive care units (ICUs) from January 2007 to December 2014. DAA during the hospital stay was extracted retrospectively from patient medical records. Demographics, comorbidities, initial CA characteristics, concomitant therapies, prognostic tests (clinical examination, electroencephalography (EEG), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs)), and cause of death were identified.

resultsFrom a total 4646 CA patients, 2478 (53%) died in-hospital, of whom 196 (4.2%; ranges 0.6-13.0%) had DAA. DAA was less frequent among out-of-hospital than in-hospital CA (82/2997 [2.7%] vs. 114/1649 [6.9%]; p < 0.001). Median times from CA to awakening and from awakening to death were 2 [1-5] and 9 [3-18] days, respectively. The main causes of DAA were multiple organ failure (n = 61), cardiogenic shock (n = 61), and re-arrest (n = 26). At day 3 from admission, results from EEG (n = 56) and SSEPs (n = 60) did not indicate poor outcome.

conclusionsIn this large multicenter cohort, DAA was observed in 4.2% of non-survivors. Information on DAA is crucial since it may influence epidemiology and the design of future CA studies evaluating neuroprognostication and neuroprotection.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCause of DeathCohort StudiesComaEuropeFemaleHumansHypoxiaIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStatistics, NonparametricWithholding TreatmentAwakeningCardiac arrestOutcomePrognostication

Identifiers

PMID30944013
PMCPMC6446295
OpenAlexW2940653920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.