ArticleBMC medical imaging2019
Repeatability and reproducibility of cerebral
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variability by region and method in human brain sodium concentrations estimated byScientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Mapping Regional Brain Total Sodium Concentration Using Anatomically Guided Reconstruction of Dual-Echo Sodium-23 MRI: Moving toward Improved Accuracy and Precision.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Hardware and Software Setup for QuantitativeSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The use of 7T MRI in multiple sclerosis: review and consensus statement from the North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative.Brain communications · 2024Review
- Quantitative Sodium (Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Frontiers of Sodium MRI Revisited: From Cartilage to Brain Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2021Review
- Review
- Evaluation of Sodium (In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInitial reports of
methodsIn this prospective, IRB approved study 12 consecutive healthy volunteers (8 female, age 31 ± 8.3) underwent three cerebral
resultsExcellent correlation was found between repeated measurements on the same day (r
conclusionOur study has shown that intra-individual
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.