Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30943887›Full record

ArticleStroke2019

Blood Flow Lateralization and Collateral Compensatory Mechanisms in Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Laleh Zarrinkoob, Anders Wåhlin, Khalid Ambarki, Richard Birgander, Anders Eklund, Jan Malm

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laleh ZarrinkoobFrom the Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå, Sweden (L.Z., J.M.).
Anders WåhlinDepartment of Radiation Science, Umeå, Sweden (A.W., K.A., R.B., A.E.).
Khalid AmbarkiDepartment of Radiation Science, Umeå, Sweden (A.W., K.A., R.B., A.E.).
Richard BirganderDepartment of Radiation Science, Umeå, Sweden (A.W., K.A., R.B., A.E.).
Anders EklundDepartment of Radiation Science, Umeå, Sweden (A.W., K.A., R.B., A.E.).
Jan MalmFrom the Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå, Sweden (L.Z., J.M.).
Umeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging enables quantification of blood flow rate (BFR; mL/min) in multiple cerebral arteries simultaneously, making it a promising technique for hemodynamic investigation in patients with stroke. The aim of this study was to quantify the hemodynamic disturbance and the compensatory pattern of collateral flow in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Methods- Thirty-eight patients (mean, 72 years; 27 men) with symptomatic carotid stenosis (≥50%) or occlusion were investigated using 4-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. For each patient, BFR was measured in 19 arteries/locations. The ipsilateral side to the symptomatic carotid stenosis was compared with the contralateral side. Results- Internal carotid artery BFR was lower on the ipsilateral side (134±87 versus 261±95 mL/min; P<0.001). BFR in anterior cerebral artery (A1 segment) was lower on ipsilateral side (35±58 versus 119±72 mL/min; P<0.001). Anterior cerebral artery territory bilaterally was primarily supplied by contralateral internal carotid artery. The ipsilateral internal carotid artery mainly supplied the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory. MCA was also supplied by a reversed BFR found in the ophthalmic and the posterior communicating artery routes on the ipsilateral side (-5±28 versus 10±28 mL/min, P=0.001, and -2±12 versus 6±6 mL/min, P=0.03, respectively). Despite these compensations, BFR in MCA was lower on the ipsilateral side, and this laterality was more pronounced in patients with severe carotid stenosis (≥70%). Although comparing ipsilateral MCA BFR between stenosis groups (<70% and ≥70%), there was no difference ( P=0.95). Conclusions- With a novel approach using 4-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging, we could simultaneously quantify and rank the importance of collateral routes in patients with carotid stenosis. An important observation was that contralateral internal carotid artery mainly secured the bilateral anterior cerebral artery territory. Because of the collateral recruitment, compromised BFR in MCA is not necessarily related to the degree of carotid stenosis. These findings highlight the importance of simultaneous investigation of the hemodynamics of the entire cerebral arterial tree.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBlood Flow VelocityCarotid StenosisCerebrovascular CirculationCollateral CirculationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUltrasonography, Doppler, Transcranialcarotid stenosiscircle of Willishumansmagnetic resonance imaging, cinemiddle cerebral artery

Identifiers

PMID30943887
PMCPMC6485302
OpenAlexW2930277906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.