Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30943885›Full record

ArticleStroke2019

Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation Prevents Ruptures and Improves Outcomes in a Model of Intracranial Aneurysm in Mice.

Tomoaki Suzuki, Tsubasa Takizawa, Yoshinobu Kamio, Tao Qin, Tomoki Hashimoto, Yukihiko Fujii, Yuichi Murayama, Aman B Patel, Cenk Ayata

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04126408 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Headache in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwell HealthRan2020 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsSubarachnoid Hemorrhage, AneurysmalArmsgammaCore
NCT05103566 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

STORM: Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation (nVNS) in the Treatment of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2022 to 2029Enrolled25ConditionsSubarachnoid Hemorrhage, AneurysmalArmsgammaCore
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Spreading Depolarizations and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomoaki SuzukiFrom the Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown (T.S., T.T., T.Q., C.A.).
Tsubasa TakizawaFrom the Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown (T.S., T.T., T.Q., C.A.).
Yoshinobu KamioDepartments of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco (Y.K.).
Tao QinFrom the Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown (T.S., T.T., T.Q., C.A.).
Tomoki HashimotoDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ (T.H.).
Yukihiko FujiiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Japan (T.S., Y.F.).
Yuichi MurayamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan (T.S., Y.M.).
Aman B PatelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.P.).
Cenk AyataFrom the Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown (T.S., T.T., T.Q., C.A.).
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USBarrow Neurological Institute · USJikei University School of Medicine · JPNiigata University · JPUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Targeting ROCK for Neurogliovascular Plasticity & Remodeling After StrokeP01NS055104 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LO, ENG H. · 2007 to 2018
$13.3M
Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation targeting cortical spreading depression in migrane prophylaxisR01NS102969 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI AYATA, CENK · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Neural & Vascular Dysfunction As Mechanisms of Injury in Genetic Migraine ModelsR01NS061505 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI AYATA, CENK · 2008 to 2012
$1.8M
The Role of Mast Cells in the Pathophysiology of Intracranial AneurysmR01NS082280 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HASHIMOTO, TOMOKI · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS055104NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS061505NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082280NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Inflammation is a critical determinant of aneurysmal wall destabilization, growth, and rupture risk. Targeting inflammation may suppress aneurysm rupture. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been shown to suppress inflammation both systemically and in the central nervous system. Therefore, we tested the effect of a novel noninvasive transcutaneous VNS approach on aneurysm rupture and outcome in a mouse model of intracranial aneurysm formation with wall inflammation. Methods- Aneurysms were induced by a single stereotaxic injection of elastase into the cerebrospinal fluid at the skull base, combined with systemic deoxycorticosterone-salt hypertension, without or with high-salt diet, for mild or severe outcomes, respectively. Cervical VNS (two 2-minute stimulations 5 minutes apart) was delivered once a day starting from the day after elastase injection for the duration of follow-up. Transcutaneous stimulation of the femoral nerve (FNS) served as control. Multiple aneurysms developed in the circle of Willis and its major branches, resulting in spontaneous ruptures and subarachnoid hemorrhage, neurological deficits, and mortality. Results- In the milder model, VNS significantly reduced aneurysm rupture rate compared with FNS (29% versus 80%, respectively). Subarachnoid hemorrhage grades were also lower in the VNS group. In the more severe model, both VNS and FNS arms developed very high rupture rates (77% and 85%, respectively). However, VNS significantly improved the survival rate compared with FNS after rupture (median survival 13 versus 6 days, respectively), without diminishing the subarachnoid hemorrhage grades. Chronic daily VNS reduced MMP-9 (matrix metalloproteinase-9) expression compared with FNS, providing a potential mechanism of action. As an important control, chronic daily VNS did not alter systemic arterial blood pressure compared with FNS. Conclusions- VNS can reduce aneurysm rupture rates and improve the outcome from ruptured aneurysms.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAneurysm, RupturedAnimalsIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPancreatic ElastaseRandom AllocationSodium Chloride, DietarySwineTreatment OutcomeVagus Nerve StimulationPancreatic ElastaseSodium Chloride, Dietaryelastasehypertensioninflammationintracranial aneurysmsubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID30943885
PMCPMC6476688
OpenAlexW2933845985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.