Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30943868›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2019

Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of IDH1 Mutation in Progressive Gliomas by Allele-Specific qPCR and Western Blot Analysis.

Moritz Perrech, Lena Dreher, Gabriele Röhn, Pantelis Stavrinou, Boris Krischek, Mohammad Toliat, Roland Goldbrunner, Marco Timmer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SDS-CRISPR for Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Antidepressant effects of total iridoids ofPharmaceutical biology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Moritz Perrech1 Laboratory of Neuro-oncology and Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Lena Dreher1 Laboratory of Neuro-oncology and Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Gabriele Röhn1 Laboratory of Neuro-oncology and Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Pantelis Stavrinou1 Laboratory of Neuro-oncology and Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Boris Krischek1 Laboratory of Neuro-oncology and Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Mohammad Toliat2 Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Roland Goldbrunner1 Laboratory of Neuro-oncology and Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Marco Timmer1 Laboratory of Neuro-oncology and Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8790-9617
University Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, diagnosis of IDH1 mutation is based on DNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry, methods limited in terms of sensitivity and ease of use. Recently, the diagnosis of IDH1 mutation by real-time polymerase chain reaction was introduced as an alternative method. In this study, real-time polymerase chain reaction was validated as a tool for detection of IDH1 mutation, and expression levels were analyzed for correlation with course of the disease. A total of 113 tumor samples were obtained intraoperatively from 84 patients with glioma having a diagnosis of diffuse glioma (World Health Organization II), anaplastic glioma (World Health Organization III), secondary glioblastoma ± chemotherapy, primary glioblastoma ± chemotherapy (World Health Organization IV). Tumor samples were snap frozen and processed for sectioning and RNA and protein isolation. Presence of IDH1 mutation was determined by DNA sequencing. Hereafter, quantitative expression of IDH1 messenger RNA was assessed using real-time polymerase chain reaction with specific primers for IDH1 mutation and -wt; protein expression was verified by Western Blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. Additionally, 19 samples of low-grade glioma and their consecutive high-grade glioma were analyzed at different time points of the disease. IDH1 mutation was identified in 63% of samples by DNA sequencing. In correlation with the real-time polymerase chain reaction results, a cutoff value was determined. Above this threshold, sensitivity and specificity of real-time polymerase chain reaction in detecting IDH1 mutation were 98% and 94%, respectively. Quantitative analysis revealed that IDH1 mutation expression is upregulated in secondary glioblastoma (mean ± standard error of mean: 3.52 ± 0.55) compared to lower grade glioma (II = 1.54 ± 0.22; III = 1.67 ± 0.23). In contrast, IDH1 wt expression is upregulated in all glioma grades (concentration >0.1) compared to control brain tissue (0.007 ± 0.0016). Western Blot analysis showed a high concordance to both sequencing and real-time polymerase chain reaction results in qualitative analysis of IDH1 mutation status (specificity 100% and sensitivity 100%). Moreover, semiquantitative protein expression analysis also showed higher expression levels of mutated IDH1 in secondary glioblastoma. In our study, real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western Blot analysis were found to be highly efficient methods in detecting IDH1 mutation in glioma samples. As cost-effective and time-saving methods, real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western Blot analysis may therefore play an important role in IDH1 mutation analysis in the future. IDH1 mutation expression level was found to correlate with the course of disease to a certain extent. Yet, clinical factors as recurrent disease or prior radiochemotherapy did not alter IDH1 mutation expression level.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAllelesBlotting, WesternBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate Dehydrogenasechemotherapyglioblastomaisocitrate dehydrogenase 1qPCRsequencing

Identifiers

PMID30943868
PMCPMC6457076
OpenAlexW2929208279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.