Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30943833›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2019

Firing rate models for gamma oscillations.

Stephen Keeley, Áine Byrne, André Fenton, John Rinzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Firing rate models for gamma oscillations in I-I and E-I networks.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predictive coding models for pain perception.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A recurrent circuit implements normalization, simulating the dynamics of V1 activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Excitatory/Inhibitory Responses Shape Coherent Neuronal Dynamics Driven by Optogenetic Stimulation in the Primate Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen KeeleyCenter for Neural Science, New York University , New York, New York.
Áine ByrneCenter for Neural Science, New York University , New York, New York.
André FentonCenter for Neural Science, New York University , New York, New York.
John RinzelCenter for Neural Science, New York University , New York, New York.

Funding

Neural coordination and discoordination in Fmr1 null miceR01NS105472 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI FENTON, ANDRE ANTONIO · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
The Application of Generalized Linear Models to Calcium Imaging Data for Optimal High-Dimensional Receptive Field Estimation and Identification of Latent Network DynamicsF32MH115445 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI KEELEY, STEPHEN L · 2017 to 2019
$190k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH115445NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gamma oscillations are readily observed in a variety of brain regions during both waking and sleeping states. Computational models of gamma oscillations typically involve simulations of large networks of synaptically coupled spiking units. These networks can exhibit strongly synchronized gamma behavior, whereby neurons fire in near synchrony on every cycle, or weakly modulated gamma behavior, corresponding to stochastic, sparse firing of the individual units on each cycle of the population gamma rhythm. These spiking models offer valuable biophysical descriptions of gamma oscillations; however, because they involve many individual neuronal units they are limited in their ability to communicate general network-level dynamics. Here we demonstrate that few-variable firing rate models with established synaptic timescales can account for both strongly synchronized and weakly modulated gamma oscillations. These models go beyond the classical formulations of rate models by including at least two dynamic variables per population: firing rate and synaptic activation. The models' flexibility to capture the broad range of gamma behavior depends directly on the timescales that represent recruitment of the excitatory and inhibitory firing rates. In particular, we find that weakly modulated gamma oscillations occur robustly when the recruitment timescale of inhibition is faster than that of excitation. We present our findings by using an extended Wilson-Cowan model and a rate model derived from a network of quadratic integrate-and-fire neurons. These biophysical rate models capture the range of weakly modulated and coherent gamma oscillations observed in spiking network models, while additionally allowing for greater tractability and systems analysis.

Indexed as

Gamma RhythmModels, NeurologicalAnimalsBrainHumansNeuronsSynaptic Potentialsgamma oscillationsrate modelWilson-Cowan model

Identifiers

PMID30943833
PMCPMC6734071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.