ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2019
Firing rate models for gamma oscillations.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced neural plasticity of the primary visual cortex in visual snow syndrome: evidence from magnetoencephalographic gamma oscillations.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Firing rate models for gamma oscillations in I-I and E-I networks.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2024Article
- Analyzing top-down visual attention in the context of gamma oscillations: a layer- dependent network-of- networks approach.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024Article
- Review
- Shape analysis of gamma rhythm supports a superlinear inhibitory regime in an inhibition-stabilized network.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Bidirectionally Regulating Gamma Oscillations in Wilson-Cowan Model by Self-Feedback Loops: A Computational Study.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Article
- Predictive coding models for pain perception.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2021Article
- Model Reduction Captures Stochastic Gamma Oscillations on Low-Dimensional Manifolds.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2021Article
- A recurrent circuit implements normalization, simulating the dynamics of V1 activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Understanding the dynamics of biological and neural oscillator networks through exact mean-field reductions: a review.Journal of mathematical neuroscience · 2020Review
- Excitatory/Inhibitory Responses Shape Coherent Neuronal Dynamics Driven by Optogenetic Stimulation in the Primate Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Element-wise and Recursive Solutions for the Power Spectral Density of Biological Stochastic Dynamical Systems at Fixed Points.Physical review researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gamma oscillations are readily observed in a variety of brain regions during both waking and sleeping states. Computational models of gamma oscillations typically involve simulations of large networks of synaptically coupled spiking units. These networks can exhibit strongly synchronized gamma behavior, whereby neurons fire in near synchrony on every cycle, or weakly modulated gamma behavior, corresponding to stochastic, sparse firing of the individual units on each cycle of the population gamma rhythm. These spiking models offer valuable biophysical descriptions of gamma oscillations; however, because they involve many individual neuronal units they are limited in their ability to communicate general network-level dynamics. Here we demonstrate that few-variable firing rate models with established synaptic timescales can account for both strongly synchronized and weakly modulated gamma oscillations. These models go beyond the classical formulations of rate models by including at least two dynamic variables per population: firing rate and synaptic activation. The models' flexibility to capture the broad range of gamma behavior depends directly on the timescales that represent recruitment of the excitatory and inhibitory firing rates. In particular, we find that weakly modulated gamma oscillations occur robustly when the recruitment timescale of inhibition is faster than that of excitation. We present our findings by using an extended Wilson-Cowan model and a rate model derived from a network of quadratic integrate-and-fire neurons. These biophysical rate models capture the range of weakly modulated and coherent gamma oscillations observed in spiking network models, while additionally allowing for greater tractability and systems analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.