Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2019
Using mH ealth Tools to Improve Access and Coverage of People With Public Health Insurance and High Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Argentina: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.
Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital tracking, provider decision support systems, and targeted client communication via mobile devices to improve primary health care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Digital Health Solutions for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Mobile phone-based interventions for improving adherence to medication prescribed for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Using mH ealth Tools to Improve Access and Coverage of People With Public Health Insurance and High Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Argentina: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Trial
- Article
- The effectiveness of eHealth-based cardiovascular disease risk communication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Task-sharing for non-communicable disease prevention and control in low- and middle-income countries in the context of health worker shortages: A systematic review.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Epidemiology of cardiometabolic health in Latin America and strategies to address disparities.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024Review
- The use and potential impact of digital health tools at the community level: results from a multi-country survey of community health workers.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Managing high cardiovascular disease risk among adults in Argentina using a multicomponent strategy linking key aspects of care: A two-arm cluster-randomized clinical trial (PRIMECare) protocol.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- Digital health interventions for non-communicable disease management in primary health care in low-and middle-income countries.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Strengthening therapeutic adherence and pharmacovigilance to antimalarial treatment in Manaus, Brazil: a multicomponent strategy using mHealth.Malaria journal · 2022Article
- Hypertension and Dyslipidaemia in Argentina: Patient Journey Stages.International journal of general medicine · 2022Review
- An innovative approach to improve the detection and treatment of risk factors in poor urban settings: a feasibility study in Argentina.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Utilising digital health to improve medication-related quality of care for hypertensive patients: An integrative literature review.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- Understanding the rise of cardiometabolic diseases in low- and middle-income countries.Nature medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background Control of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) risk factors is suboptimal in Argentina, despite the government's provision of free blood pressure and cholesterol-lowering medications for people without private insurance. We assessed whether community health workers' use of an integrated mH ealth tool encourages patients to attend visits at primary care clinics to improve CVD risk management in 2 provinces of Argentina. Methods and Results We conducted a pragmatic cluster randomized trial, with primary care clinics randomly assigned to intervention or control. Eligible people were aged 40 to 79 years, lived in the catchment area of primary care clinics, possessed a mobile phone for personal use, had public health coverage, and a 10-year CVD risk ≥10%. In the control arm, community health workers screened for CVD risk using a paper-based tool and encouraged high-risk people to present to the primary care clinics for care. In the intervention arm, community health workers used the mH ealth tool to calculate CVD risk and confirm a scheduled physician appointment. Primary outcomes were the proportion of participants who attended a baseline visit and completed at least 1 follow-up, respectively. We enrolled 755 people (376 interventions; 379 controls). Intervention participants were significantly more likely to complete baseline visits (49.4% versus 13.5%, P value 0.0008) and follow-up visits (31.9% versus 7.7%; P value 0.0041). The use of chronic medication and current smoking were significant predictors of primary outcomes. Conclusions Use of mH ealth tools identifies patients at high CVD risk in their home, increases the likelihood of participating in chronic CVD risk factor management, and strengthens referrals. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 02913339.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.