Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30943793›Full record

ArticleIntegrative cancer therapies

Analyses of BMAL1 and PER2 Oscillations in a Model of Breast Cancer Progression Reveal Changes With Malignancy.

Hui-Hsien Lin, Maan Qraitem, Yue Lian, Stephanie R Taylor, Michelle E Farkas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative cancer therapies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Circadian clock and cancer.Military Medical Research · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Macrophage circadian rhythms are differentially affected based on stimuli.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Unjamming and collective migration in MCF10A breast cancer cell lines.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui-Hsien Lin1 University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Maan Qraitem2 Colby College, Waterville, ME, USA.
Yue Lian2 Colby College, Waterville, ME, USA.
Stephanie R Taylor2 Colby College, Waterville, ME, USA.
Michelle E Farkas1 University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5824-1243
Colby College · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

CHEMISTRY-BIOLOGY INTERFACE PREDOCTORAL TRAINING GRANTST32GM008515 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI THOMPSON, LYNMARIE K. · 1995 to 2020
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From an epidemiological standpoint, disruptions to circadian rhythms have been shown to contribute to the development of various disease pathologies, including breast cancer. However, it is unclear how altered circadian rhythms are related to malignant transformations at the molecular level. In this article, a series of isogenic breast cancer cells representing disease progression was used to investigate the expression patterns of core circadian clock proteins BMAL1 and PER2. Our model is indicative of 4 stages of breast cancer and includes the following cells: MCF10A (non-malignant), MCF10AT.Cl2 (pre-malignant), MCF10Ca1h (well-differentiated, malignant), and MCF10Ca1a (poorly differentiated, malignant). While studies of circadian rhythms in cancer typically use low-resolution reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays, we also employed luciferase reporters BMAL1:Luc and PER2:Luc in real-time luminometry experiments. We found that across all 4 cancer stages, PER2 showed relatively stable oscillations compared with BMAL1. Period estimation using both wavelet-based and damped-sine-fitting methods showed that the periods are distributed over a wide circadian range and there is no clear progression in mean period as cancer severity progresses. Additionally, we used the K-nearest neighbors algorithm to classify the recordings according to cancer line, and found that cancer stages were largely differentiated from one another. Taken together, our data support that there are circadian discrepancies between normal and malignant cells, but it is difficult and insufficient to singularly use period evaluations to differentiate them. Future studies should employ other progressive disease models to determine whether these findings are representative across cancer types or are specific to this series.

Indexed as

ARNTL Transcription FactorsBreastBreast NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCells, CulturedCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmDisease ProgressionFemaleHEK293 CellsHumansPeriod Circadian ProteinsARNTL Transcription FactorsBMAL1 protein, humanPER2 protein, humanPeriod Circadian Proteinsbreast cancerdisrupted circadian rhythmsisogenic cell linesluciferase reportersmachine learningperiod-estimation

Identifiers

PMID30943793
PMCPMC6449806
OpenAlexW2926248063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.