ArticleThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2019
Pediatric Complex Chronic Conditions: Does the Classification System Work for Infants?
Article in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive model for the risk of paediatric intensive care utilization in children with medical complexity: A longitudinal retrospective cohort study.Nursing in critical care · 2025Article
- Clinical and socio-demographic profile of children receiving pediatric palliative care in a tertiary hospital of a metropolitan city in India.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Observational
- Defining and quantifying population-level need for children's palliative care: findings from a rapid scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Respiratory syncytial virus-associated hospitalizations among children: an Italian retrospective observational study.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024Observational
- Predictive Ability of an Illness Severity Measure: Implications for Nursing Research.Journal of nursing measurement · 2021Article
- Pediatric Complex Chronic Conditions: Evaluating Two Versions of the Classification System.Western journal of nursing research · 2020Article
- A National Study of Healthcare Service Patterns at the End of Life Among Children With Cardiac Disease.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne widely accepted approach to identify children with life-limiting health problems is the complex chronic conditions (CCCs) classification system. Although considered the "gold standard" for classifying children with serious illness, little is known about its performance, especially among infants. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: This research examined the prevalence of CCCs and the infant characteristics related to a CCC classification.
methodsMultivariate regression analysis was conducted with 2012 Kids' Inpatient Database, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data files, using a national sample of infant decedents less than 1 year.
resultsOur findings showed that 40% of the infants were classified with a CCC. African Americans were negatively associated with a CCC classification (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.543-0.731). When infants had other insurance coverage, they were less likely (aOR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.537-0.748) to have a CCC classification. Infants who resided in nonurban areas (aOR = 1.21; 95% CI =1.034-1.415) and had comorbidities (aOR = 38.19; 95% CI = 33.12-44.04) had greater odds of having a CCC classification.
conclusionsThe findings suggested that the infants are not commonly classified with a CCC and highlighted the significant variation in race with African American infants exhibiting different CCC classifications than Caucasian infants. Given the importance of reducing disparities in palliative care, critical attention to using CCC classifications in research is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.