Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30943755›Full record

ArticleCartilage2021

Arthroscopic Treatment of Patellar and Trochlear Cartilage Lesions with Matrix Encapsulated Chondrocyte Implantation versus Microfracture: Quantitative Assessment with MRI T2-Mapping and MOCART at 4-Year Follow-up.

Anell Olivos Meza, Socorro Cortés González, Jairo José Ferniza Garza, Francisco Javier Pérez Jiménez, Villalobos Córdova Enrique, Clemente Ibarra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cartilage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anell Olivos MezaInstituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion, Mexico City, Mexico.
Socorro Cortés GonzálezInstituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jairo José Ferniza GarzaInstituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion, Mexico City, Mexico.
Francisco Javier Pérez JiménezInstituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion, Mexico City, Mexico.
Villalobos Córdova EnriqueInstituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion, Mexico City, Mexico.
Clemente IbarraInstituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methodsSeventeen patients aged 18 to 55 years with symptomatic full-thickness cartilage lesions on either patella or trochlea were treated with matrix autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) or microfracture (MF). Both procedures combined with unloading/realigning techniques. Clinical assessment and T2-mapping were evaluated at 48-months.

resultsClinically results from pre-op to 48-months improved significantly in MACI and MF for Lysholm (

conclusionsClinically both techniques improved significantly over time. However, quantitative assessment showed that only newly formed tissue with MACI technique improves significantly since 12-months and maintains stable values compared with native cartilage until 48-month follow-up. MF results were never comparable to those native values. Level of evidence II.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularFractures, StressChondrocytesFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPatellaProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTransplantation, Autologouscartilage repairchondrocyte implantationmicrofracturepatellar chondral lesionstrochlear chondral lesions

Identifiers

PMID30943755
PMCPMC8236658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.