Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30943703›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2019

Endoscopic Lumbar Surgery: The State of the Art in 2019

Alexander J Butler, Milad Alam, Kevin Wiley, Alexander Ghasem, Augustus J Rush Iii, Jeffrey C Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Virtual reality for surgical training in balloon kyphoplasty procedure.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Trial
  2. Infinity decompression: a stepwise biportal endoscopic over-the-top decompression - surgical technique and outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolving Role of Lumbar Decompression: A Narrative Review.International journal of spine surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Awake Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander J ButlerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami Hospital, Miami, FL, USA.
Milad AlamUSC Spine Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kevin WileyUSC Spine Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alexander GhasemDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami Hospital, Miami, FL, USA.
Augustus J Rush IiiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami Hospital, Miami, FL, USA.
Jeffrey C WangUSC Spine Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was aimed to provide a brief historical perspective to facilitate appreciation of current techniques, describe outcomes of endoscopic lumbar surgery relative to those of existing techniques, and identify topics in need of study and future directions for the field of endoscopic lumbar surgery. Using the PubMed database, a comprehensive search was conducted to identify peer-reviewed English language articles pertaining to endoscopic lumbar surgery. Lack of focus on pertinent techniques or lack of outcome measures constituted exclusion criteria. A majority of included articles were published from 2015–2019. A context with which to appreciate the application of endoscopic lumbar techniques is established. An abundance of case series and several recent comparison studies have documented the benefits and potential pitfalls of these methods in the past two decades. The advantages of endoscopic lumbar spine surgery are widely touted to include reduced perioperative morbidity, including blood loss, operative time and immediate postoperative recovery, minimal structural trauma resulting from surgery, generally positive patient report outcome scores and the potential to contain costs. Additional high-quality research assessing outcomes of endoscopic lumbar surgery are certainly needed and currently expected given the rapid expansion of the field in recent years.

Indexed as

DiscectomyEndoscopic spine surgeryEndoscopyLumbar spine surgeryMinimally invasive surgeryTechnology

Identifiers

PMID30943703
PMCPMC6449826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.