Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30943442›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicology and teratology

Screening for neurotoxic potential of 15 flame retardants using freshwater planarians.

Siqi Zhang, Danielle Ireland, Nisha S Sipes, Mamta Behl, Eva-Maria S Collins

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicology and teratology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in ecotoxicological research using planarians: a comprehensive review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Review
  3. Rapid behavioral screening in the planarianFrontiers in toxicology · 2026
    Article
  4. Statistical analysis of multi-endpoint phenotypic screening increases sensitivity of planarian neurotoxicity testing.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Chemical Exposure-Induced Developmental Neurotoxicity in Head-Regenerating Schmidtea mediterranea.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Environmental neurotoxic pollutants: review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Siqi ZhangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Danielle IrelandDivision of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Department of Biology, Swarthmore College Swarthmore, PA 19081, USA.
Nisha S SipesDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Mamta BehlDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Eva-Maria S CollinsDivision of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Department of Physics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Department of Biology, Swarthmore College Swarthmore, PA 19081, USA. Electronic address: ecollin3@swarthmore.edu.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USSwarthmore College · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Toxicological Assessments for the National Toxicology ProgramZIAES103316 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALKER, NIGEL J · 2016 to 2019
$31.9M
Biomolecular Screening and Alternative Approaches for the National Toxicology ProgramZIAES103318 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CASEY, WARREN · 2016 to 2021
$25.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES103316Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES103318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asexual freshwater planarians are an attractive invertebrate model for high-throughput neurotoxicity screening, because they possess multiple quantifiable behaviors to assess distinct neuronal functions. Planarians uniquely allow direct comparisons between developing and adult animals to distinguish developmentally selective effects from general neurotoxicity. In this study, we used our automated planarian screening platform to compare the neurotoxicity of 15 flame retardants (FRs), consisting of representative phased-out brominated (BFRs) and replacement organophosphorus FRs (OPFRs). OPFRs have emerged as a proposed safer alternative to BFRs; however, limited information is available on their health effects. We found 11 of the 15 FRs (3/6 BFRs, 7/8 OPFRs, and Firemaster 550) caused adverse effects in both adult and developing planarians with similar nominal lowest-effect-levels for BFRs and OPFRs. This suggests that replacement OPFRs are comparably neurotoxic to the phased-out compounds. BFRs were primarily systemically toxic, whereas OPFRs, except Tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate, shared a behavioral phenotype in response to noxious heat at sublethal concentrations, indicating specific neurotoxic effects. We found this behavioral phenotype was correlated with cholinesterase inhibition, thus linking behavioral outcomes to molecular targets. By directly comparing effects on adult and developing planarians, we further found that one BFR (3,3',5,5'-Tetrabromobisphenol A) caused a developmental selective defect. Together, these results demonstrate that our planarian screening platform yields high content data from various behavioral and morphological endpoints, allowing us to distinguish selective neurotoxic effects and effects specific to the developing nervous system. Ten of these 11 bioactive FRs were previously found to be bioactive in other models, including cell culture and alternative animal models (nematodes and zebrafish). This level of concordance across different platforms emphasizes the urgent need for further evaluation of OPFRs in mammalian systems.

Indexed as

AnimalsFlame RetardantsNeurotoxinsPlanariansToxicity Tests, AcuteFlame RetardantsNeurotoxinsAlternative animal modelsDevelopmental neurotoxicityFlame retardantsOPFRsPlanarianPolybrominated diphenyl ethers

Identifiers

PMID30943442
PMCPMC9524722
OpenAlexW2914049814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.