Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30943249›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Impact of Medicaid coverage expansion under the Affordable Care Act on mammography and pap tests utilization among low-income women.

Abeer G Alharbi, M Mahmud Khan, Ronnie Horner, Heather Brandt, Cole Chapman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Access to Care as a Barrier to Mammography for Black Women.Policy, politics & nursing practice · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Variation in State-Level Mammography Use, 2012 and 2020.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abeer G AlharbiHealth Services Policy and Management Department, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7365-138X
M Mahmud KhanHealth Services Policy and Management Department, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
Ronnie HornerHealth Services Policy and Management Department, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
Heather BrandtHealth Promotion, Education, and Behavior Department, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
Cole ChapmanHealth Services Policy and Management Department, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded the coverage of Medicaid to include entire population with income below 138% of federal poverty line. It remains unclear whether this policy change has improved access to and utilization of health care, particularly use of mammography and Pap tests among poor women.

methodsWe used a difference-in-difference (DID) design to estimate the impact of Medicaid expansion on mammography and Pap tests utilization among low-income women. Expansion states are the treatment group and non-expansion states are the control group. The years 2012-13 are the pre-expansion period and 2015-16 are the post-expansion period for the purpose of estimating the DID parameters.

resultsThe difference-in-difference estimate show that likelihood of utilizing mammograms did not change significantly among low-income women after the implementation of Medicaid expansion (DID coefficient -0.0476 with t-statistics at -1.26), Pap test decreased (coefficient -0.0615, t-statistics -2.76), and Medicaid enrollment has increased significantly among low-income women living in expansion states (coefficient 0.0889 with t-value of 3.68).

conclusionExpansion of Medicaid was associated with increased Medicaid enrollment but did not yield near-term improvement in use of mammography and Pap tests among low-income women. Factors beyond health insurance coverage may be important in determining the likelihood of obtaining these screenings. Policy makers should try to identify other barriers to cancer screenings among low-income women in the USA.

Indexed as

AdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInsurance CoverageMammographyMedicaidMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPovertyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30943249
PMCPMC6447234
OpenAlexW2929018547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.