ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2019
A supervised machine learning approach to characterize spinal network function.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Episodic rhythmicity is generated by a distributed neural network in the developing mammalian spinal cord.iScience · 2025Article
- Contributions of h- and NaFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021Article
- A dynamic role for dopamine receptors in the control of mammalian spinal networks.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A supervised machine learning approach to characterize spinal network function.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous activity is a common feature of immature neuronal networks throughout the central nervous system and plays an important role in network development and consolidation. In postnatal rodents, spontaneous activity in the spinal cord exhibits complex, stochastic patterns that have historically proven challenging to characterize. We developed a software tool for quickly and automatically characterizing and classifying episodes of spontaneous activity generated from developing spinal networks. We recorded spontaneous activity from in vitro lumbar ventral roots of 16 neonatal [postnatal day (P)0-P3] mice. Recordings were DC coupled and detrended, and episodes were separated for analysis. Amplitude-, duration-, and frequency-related features were extracted from each episode and organized into five classes. Paired classes and features were used to train and test supervised machine learning algorithms. Multilayer perceptrons were used to classify episodes as rhythmic or multiburst. We increased network excitability with potassium chloride and tested the utility of the tool to detect changes in features and episode class. We also demonstrate usability by having a novel experimenter use the program to classify episodes collected at a later time point (P5). Supervised machine learning-based classification of episodes accounted for changes that traditional approaches cannot detect. Our tool, named SpontaneousClassification, advances the detail in which we can study not only developing spinal networks, but also spontaneous networks in other areas of the nervous system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.