Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30942564›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN2019

Neural response to emotional faces in monozygotic twins: association with familial risk of affective disorders

Iselin Meluken, Ninja Ottesen, Catherine Harmer, Julian Macoveanu, Hartwig Siebner, Lars Kessing, Maj Vinberg, Kamilla Miskowiak

Open access · bronzeAbstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hippocampal subfield morphology in monozygotic twins discordant for affective disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Iselin MelukenFrom the Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, and University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Meluken, Ottesen, Macoveanu, Kessing, Vinberg, Miskowiak); the Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Miskowiak); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Danish Research Centre of Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark (Meluken, Siebner, Miskowiak); and the Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Siebner).
Ninja OttesenFrom the Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, and University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Meluken, Ottesen, Macoveanu, Kessing, Vinberg, Miskowiak); the Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Miskowiak); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Danish Research Centre of Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark (Meluken, Siebner, Miskowiak); and the Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Siebner).
Catherine HarmerFrom the Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, and University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Meluken, Ottesen, Macoveanu, Kessing, Vinberg, Miskowiak); the Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Miskowiak); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Danish Research Centre of Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark (Meluken, Siebner, Miskowiak); and the Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Siebner).
Julian MacoveanuFrom the Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, and University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Meluken, Ottesen, Macoveanu, Kessing, Vinberg, Miskowiak); the Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Miskowiak); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Danish Research Centre of Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark (Meluken, Siebner, Miskowiak); and the Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Siebner).
Hartwig SiebnerFrom the Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, and University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Meluken, Ottesen, Macoveanu, Kessing, Vinberg, Miskowiak); the Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Miskowiak); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Danish Research Centre of Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark (Meluken, Siebner, Miskowiak); and the Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Siebner).
Lars KessingFrom the Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, and University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Meluken, Ottesen, Macoveanu, Kessing, Vinberg, Miskowiak); the Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Miskowiak); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Danish Research Centre of Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark (Meluken, Siebner, Miskowiak); and the Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Siebner).
Maj VinbergFrom the Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, and University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Meluken, Ottesen, Macoveanu, Kessing, Vinberg, Miskowiak); the Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Miskowiak); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Danish Research Centre of Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark (Meluken, Siebner, Miskowiak); and the Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Siebner).
Kamilla MiskowiakFrom the Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, and University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Meluken, Ottesen, Macoveanu, Kessing, Vinberg, Miskowiak); the Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Miskowiak); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Danish Research Centre of Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark (Meluken, Siebner, Miskowiak); and the Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Siebner).
University of Oxford · GBCopenhagen University Hospital · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aberrant neural and cognitive response to emotional faces has been observed in people at familial risk of an affective disorder. In this functional MRI study of monozygotic twins, we explored neural correlates of the attentional avoidance of emotional faces that we had previously observed in high-risk versus affected twins, and whether an abnormal neural response to emotional faces represents a risk endophenotype. Methods: We recruited unaffected monozygotic twins with a co-twin history of mood episodes (high-risk), monozygotic twins with previous mood episodes (affected) and monozygotic twins with no personal or first-degree history of mood episodes (low-risk) between December 2014 and January 2017 based on a nationwide register linkage. Participants viewed fearful and happy faces while performing a gender discrimination task during functional MRI (fMRI) and performed emotional faces dot-probe and facial expression recognition tasks outside the scanner. Results: A total of 129 monozygotic twins underwent whole-brain fMRI. Highrisk twins (n = 38) displayed greater medial and superior prefrontal response to emotional faces than affected twins (n = 62). This greater activity correlated with stronger attentional avoidance of emotional faces in high-risk twins. In contrast, high-risk and affected twins showed no aberrant neural activity to emotional faces compared with low-risk twins (n = 29). Limitations: A limitation of this study was its cross-sectional design. Conclusion: Greater recruitment of the medial and superior prefrontal cortex during implicit emotion processing in high-risk versus affected twins may represent a compensatory or resilience mechanism. In contrast, aberrant neural response to emotional faces does not seem to be a risk endophenotype for affective disorders.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsEndophenotypesFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMood DisordersPrefrontal CortexRiskTwins, MonozygoticYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30942564
PMCPMC6606430
OpenAlexW2955821732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.