SynthesisThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2019
Steroid withdrawal or avoidance is safe in high-risk kidney transplants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Steroid withdrawal or avoidance is safe in high-risk kidney transplants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2019Pooled it
- Twenty-Year Kidney Transplant Outcomes With Prednisone-Free Maintenance Immunosuppression: A Matched Control Analysis.Clinical transplantation · 2025Article
- Steroid Sparing Maintenance Immunosuppression in Highly Sensitised Patients Receiving Alemtuzumab Induction.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023Article
- Current status of glucocorticoid usage in solid organ transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2021Review
- Cytomegalovirus esophagitis with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease in a kidney transplant recipient.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The present study is aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal or avoidance (SWA) in high-risk kidney transplant (HRKT). We performed a systematic review of the literature and pooled analysis of the available data concerning SWA following HRKT. HRKT is associated with patients undergoing repeat kidney transplantation, in African American recipients, or in patients with panel-reactive antibody levels >20%. Seven cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial, involving a total of 22 075 patients, were included. Pooled analysis to estimate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) demonstrated comparable graft loss (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.09) between the SWA and corticosteroid maintenance groups, but with reduced mortality in the SWA group (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.98). A subanalysis suggested that SWA was not associated with increased graft loss in patients undergoing steroid withdrawal within 1 week of transplantation, in African American recipients, or in patients with follow-up >5 years. Additionally, SWA was associated with reduced death in those undergoing withdrawal within 1 week (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.98), in African Americans (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98), and in those with follow-up extended to >5 years (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.98). SWA was not associated with an increased risk of acute rejection (RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.75-1.21) or cytomegalovirus infection (RR = 1.86, 95% CI 1-3.47); however, it was associated with a reduced risk of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (RR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.97). SWA following HRKT is safe in terms of graft survival and rejection, and patients undergoing an SWA regimen had a lower risk of death and posttransplant diabetes mellitus. Future prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.