ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019
Inhibition of miR‑214 attenuates the migration and invasion of triple‑negative breast cancer cells.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The chimeric aptamer axl-miR-214sponge inhibits breast cancer and melanoma dissemination.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
- Impact of microRNA variants on PI3K/AKT signaling in triple-negative breast cancer: comprehensive review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Review
- The role of miRNAs as biomarkers in breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Genomic Index of Sensitivity to Chemotherapy for Triple Negative Breast Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Effect ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Breast cancer tumor microenvironment affects Treg/IL-17-producing Treg/Th17 cell axis: Molecular and therapeutic perspectives.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2023Review
- Review
- Association of high miR-27a, miR-206, and miR-214 expression with poor patient prognosis and increased chemoresistance in triple-negative breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- MicroRNA-214 in Health and Disease.Cells · 2021Review
- Silencing theExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- MicroRNA-598 inhibits the growth of triple negative breast cancer cells by targeting JAG1.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- Potential miRNAs for miRNA-Based Therapeutics in Breast Cancer.Non-coding RNA · 2020Review
- Mechanisms behind Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss in Diabetes and Therapeutic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- MiR-214-3p regulates the viability, invasion, migration and EMT of TNBC cells by targeting ST6GAL1.Cytotechnology · 2019Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple‑negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer. MicroRNA (miR)‑214 is closely associated with controlling the development of tumor cells; therefore, in the present study, the target gene and effects of miR‑214 on TNBC cells were explored. Luciferase activity was examined by luciferase reporter assay. The viability, invasion and migration of MDA‑MB‑231 TNBC cells were measured using Cell Counting kit‑8, Transwell and wound‑healing assays, respectively. The expression levels of various factors were determined using reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. The results demonstrated that the expression levels of miR‑214 were higher and the levels of α1‑antitrypsin (α1‑AT) were lower in TNBC tissues compared with in normal tissues. Subsequently, α1‑AT was revealed to be a target of miR‑214. Furthermore, inhibition of miR‑214 decreased cell viability, invasion and migration, enhanced the expression of E‑cadherin and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases‑2, and reduced the expression of metastatic tumour antigen 1 and matrix metalloproteinase‑2. Inhibition of miR‑214 also significantly downregulated the phosphorylation of protein kinase B (Akt) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and markedly downregulated that of phosphoinositide 3‑kinase (PI3K); however, the expression levels of total PI3K, Akt and mTOR remained stable in all groups. Taken together, these findings indicated that α1‑AT may be a target of miR‑214. Downregulation of miR‑214 markedly suppressed the viability, migration and invasion of MDA‑MB‑231 cells, and inhibited the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. These findings suggested that miR‑214 targeting α1‑AT may be a potential mechanism underlying TNBC development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.