Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30942270›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2019

Social inequalities in the use of contraceptives in adult women from Southern Brazil.

Tonantzin Ribeiro Gonçalves, Heloísa Marquardt Leite, Fernanda Souza de Bairros, Maria Teresa Anselmo Olinto, Nêmora Tregnago Barcellos, Juvenal Soares Dias da Costa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dating Applications, Sexual Behaviors, and Attitudes of College Students in Brazil's Legal Amazon.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tonantzin Ribeiro GonçalvesUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Escola de Saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Leopoldo, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0249-3358
Heloísa Marquardt LeiteUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Escola de Saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Leopoldo, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5955-2294
Fernanda Souza de BairrosUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Escola de Enfermagem. Departamento de Assistência e Orientação Profissional. Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8611-058X
Maria Teresa Anselmo OlintoUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Escola de Saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Leopoldo, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3950-4594
Nêmora Tregnago BarcellosUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Escola de Saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Leopoldo, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5812-7843
Juvenal Soares Dias da CostaUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Escola de Saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Leopoldo, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3160-6075
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos · BRUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the contraceptive methods used by adult women and the associated socioeconomic and demographic factors.

methodsPopulation-based cross-sectional study with 20 to 49-year-old women from São Leopoldo, state of Rio Grande do Sul, in 2015. Three outcomes were considered to analyze the association with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics: use of oral contraceptive pills, tubal ligation and male condom. The crude prevalence ratios, stratified by age, and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were obtained using Poisson regression, taking the experimental error into account.

resultsA total of 736 women, aged from 20 to 49 years old, were evaluated. The prevalence of the use of oral contraceptive pills, tubal ligation and male condom were respectively 31.8% (95%CI 28.4-35.3), 11.1% (95%CI 9.0-13.6) and 10.9% (95%CI 8.7-13.3). In addition, 10.5% (n = 77) of the women reported making combined use of oral contraceptive pills and condom. In the stratified analysis, younger women with lower education level and from lower social classes reported less use of oral contraceptive pills. Tubal ligation was more prevalent among the lower social classes, but only in the age group from 30 to 39 years old. No differences were found in relation to male condom.

conclusionsThe results indicated that differences persist in relation to contraception, which can be associated with both the difficulties of access to these inputs and the frailty of actions in reproductive health to achieve the needs and preferences of women who are more socially vulnerable.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsBrazilCondomsContraceptionContraceptives, OralCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsSterilization, TubalSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban PopulationYoung AdultContraceptives, Oral

Identifiers

PMID30942270
PMCPMC6474746
OpenAlexW2924398208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.