Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30942198›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

Risk Factors for Recurrent Carotid-Artery Stenosis Following Stenting Treatment.

Ranran Meng, Xiangming Mi, Dengbin Sun

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Predictors of Occlusion after Carotid Stenting.Annals of vascular surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging Quality Affected by Different Input Arteries in Patients of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ranran MengDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong, China (mainland).
Xiangming MiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong, China (mainland).
Dengbin SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong, China (mainland).
Jining First People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been regarded as a reliable treatment approach for carotid artery stenosis. However, recurrent carotid artery stenosis after CAS affects long-term outcomes. In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential risk factors for carotid restenosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients diagnosed with carotid artery stenosis who underwent CAS implantation at our department from September 2012 to July 2015. Each included study patient was followed up with serial duplex ultrasound scanning. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate freedom from restenosis and potential risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS There were 33 patients enrolled in our study. The mean age was 65.5±11.5 years. The technique was successfully achieved in all patients. No death or major stroke occurred after stenting. There were 2 events of minor stroke and one myocardial infarction within 30 days after stent implantation. All the patients were followed up for 3 years. Cumulative rates of freedom from recurrent stenosis at 1, 2, and 3 years were 87.4%, 74.6%, and 68.3% respectively. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that male sex, smoking and hyperlipidemia were independent risk factors associated with restenosis. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we identified that CAS was a reliable approach for carotid artery stenosis. Male sex, smoking, and hyperlipidemia were independent risk factors associated with restenosis. Thus, hyperlipidemia should be monitored and routine follow-up with ultrasonography are recommended especially for male patients with current or history of smoking.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarotid ArteriesCarotid StenosisEndarterectomy, CarotidFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStents

Identifiers

PMID30942198
PMCPMC6459049
OpenAlexW2933162076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.