ArticleInfection & chemotherapy2019
Article in Infection & chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health benefits of ethnic fermented foods.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Computational modeling approach to identify potential anti-Campylobacter peptides fromOpen veterinary journal · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns and Genetic Diversity ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2023Review
- Present and pioneer methods of early detection of food borne pathogens.Journal of food science and technology · 2022Review
- Molecular Detection of Campylobacter Species: Comparision ofReports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2020Article
- Investigating Major RecurringFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn July 2017, there was an outbreak of MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study of all members of the three auxiliary police squads was conducted. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to all members of the three squads and the food handlers. Rectal swabs were collected from symptomatic police and food handlers.
resultsThe overall attack rate was 20.4%, and the epidemic curve indicated a point source type outbreak. Of the 257 auxiliary policemen who consumed the incriminated lunch, 55 met the case definition. Of 36 rectal swabs, 10 were positive for
conclusionThis outbreak could have been caused by cross-contamination with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.