Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30941887›Full record

Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2019

Micronutrient powder supplements combined with nutrition education marginally improve growth amongst children aged 6-23 months in rural Burkina Faso: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Hermann B Lanou, Saskia J M Osendarp, Alemayehu Argaw, Kirrily De Polnay, Catherine Ouédraogo, Seni Kouanda, Patrick Kolsteren

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Hermann B LanouMinistry of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Innovation, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0001-6780-2700
Saskia J M OsendarpNutrition International, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3847-5584
Alemayehu ArgawNutrition International, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kirrily De PolnayChild Health and Nutrition Unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Catherine OuédraogoNutrition International, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Seni KouandaMinistry of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Innovation, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Patrick KolsterenChild Health and Nutrition Unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ghent University · BENutrition International · CAInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEJimma University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micronutrients powder (MNP) can prevent anaemia amongst children 6-23 months old. However, evidence of an effect on growth is limited and concerns about the safety of iron-containing MNP interventions limits their applicability. In a cluster randomized controlled intervention, we evaluated the effectiveness of a nutritional package including counselling and provision of MNP to improve the nutritional status of children aged 6-23 months and the effect of sustained use of MNP on morbidity in a malaria-endemic area. Child feeding practises and nutritional status were assessed through cross-sectional surveys. Biweekly morbidity surveillance and anthropometry measurements were carried out in a nested cohort study. No significant differences in the prevalence of wasting (-0.7% [-6.8, 5.3] points; p = .805), stunting (+4.6% [-2.9, 12.0] points; p = .201), or mean length-for-age z-score and weight-for-length z-score scores were found between study groups. The proportion of children with a minimum dietary diversity score and those with a minimum acceptable diet significantly increased in the intervention group compared with the control by 6.5% points (p = .043) and 5.8% points (p = .037), respectively. There were no significant differences in the risk of diarrhoea (RR: 1.68, 95% CI [0.94, 3.08]), fever (RR: 1.20 [0.82, 1.77]), and malaria (RR: 0.68 [0.37, 1.26]) between study groups. In the nested study, the rate of linear growth was higher in the intervention than in the control group by 0.013 SD/month (p = .027). In a programmatic intervention, MNP and nutrition education marginally improved child feeding practises and growth, without increasing morbidity from malaria or fever.

Indexed as

Health EducationMicronutrientsAdultBurkina FasoChild DevelopmentCounselingDiarrheaFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaleMorbidityYoung AdultMicronutrientsfeeding practisesgrowthmicronutrients powdermorbiditynutrition counselling

Identifiers

PMID30941887
PMCPMC6859995
OpenAlexW2927021116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.