Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30941733›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2019

Secretome of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Its Potential Protective Effects on Brain Pathologies.

Eliana Baez-Jurado, Oscar Hidalgo-Lanussa, Biviana Barrera-Bailón, Amirhossein Sahebkar, Ghulam Md Ashraf, Valentina Echeverria, George E Barreto

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Secretome as a Tool to Treat Neurological Conditions: Are We Ready?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Eliana Baez-JuradoDepartamento de Nutrición y Bioquímica, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
Oscar Hidalgo-LanussaDepartamento de Nutrición y Bioquímica, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
Biviana Barrera-BailónDepartamento de Nutrición y Bioquímica, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
Amirhossein SahebkarNeurogenic Inflammation Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ghulam Md AshrafKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Valentina EcheverriaFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Sebastian, Lientur 1457, 4080871, Concepción, Chile.
George E BarretoDepartamento de Nutrición y Bioquímica, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, DC, Colombia. gsampaio@javeriana.edu.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6644-1971
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana · COKing Abdulaziz University · SAMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRSan Sebastián University · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have a fundamental role in the repair and regeneration of damaged tissues. There is strong evidence showing that much of the beneficial effects of these cells are due to the secretion of bioactive molecules-besides microRNAs, hormones, and neurotrophins-with anti-inflammatory, immunoregulatory, angiogenic, and trophic effects. These factors have been reported by many studies to possess protective effects on the nervous tissue. Although the beneficial effects of the secretory factors of MSCs have been suggested for various neurological diseases, their actions on astrocytic cells are not well understood. Hence, it is important to recognize the specific effects of MSCs derived from adipose tissue, in addition to the differences presented by the secretome, depending on the source and methods of analysis. In this paper, the different sources of MSCs and their main characteristics are described, as well as the most significant advances in regeneration and protection provided by the secretome of MSCs. Also, we discuss the possible neuroprotective mechanisms of action of the MSC-derived biomolecules, with special emphasis on the effect of MSCs derived from adipose tissue and their impact on glial cells and brain pathologies.

Indexed as

NeuroprotectionAnimalsBrainHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationModels, BiologicalProteomeProteomeBrainMesenchymal stem cellsParacrine factorsPathologiesSecretomeTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID30941733
OpenAlexW2933910429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.