ArticleDaru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences2019
In vitro investigation of the effects of boron nitride nanotubes and curcumin on DNA damage.
Article in Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Boric Acid Prevents MMC- and H₂O₂-Related DNA Damage: Evidence from Cytogenetic and Comet Assays.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- 2D Hexagonal Boron Nitride (h-BN) and 1D Boron Nitride Nanotubes (BNNTs): Distinct Effects at the Cellular Level in Fish Cell Lines.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
- Boron Nanocomposites for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy and in Biomedicine: Evolvement and Challenges.Biomaterials research · 2025Review
- Understanding toxicity associated with boron nitride nanotubes: Review of toxicity studies, exposure assessment at manufacturing facilities, and read-across.Journal of materials research · 2022Article
- In Vitro and In Vivo Cytotoxicity of Boron Nitride Nanotubes: A Systematic Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backroundStem cells provide an opportunity to analyse the effects of xenobiotic on cell viability, differentiation and cell functions. Evaluation of the possible cytotoxic and DNA damaging effects on bone marrow CD34
objectivesIn this study, it was aimed to evaluate the cytotoxic and DNA damaging effects of boron nitride nanotubes which are commonly used in pyroelectric, piezoelectric and optical applications, but there is not enough information about its biocompatibility. Also, it was intended to research the effects of curcumin being used frequently in treatment processes for antioxidant properties.
methodsThe possible cytotoxic and DNA damaging effects of boron nitride nanotubes and curcumin on CD34 RESULTS AND
conclusionBoron nitride nanotubes and curcumin had cytotoxic effects and cause DNA damage on CD34
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.