ReviewCurrent oncology reports2019
The Emerging Role of Minimal Residual Disease Testing in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minimal residual disease in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after first-line therapy: Defining the continuum from metabolic remission to molecular clearance.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Intravascular Large B-Cell Lymphoma Presenting as Recurrent Cryptogenic Strokes: A Diagnostic Challenge.Case reports in hematology · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical implications of circulating tumor DNA in predicting the outcome of diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients receiving first-line therapy.BMC medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical relevance of serum-derived exosomal messenger RNA sequencing in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.Journal of Cancer · 2022Article
- Systemic immune inflammation index, ratio of lymphocytes to monocytes, lactate dehydrogenase and prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewDiffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is characterized by clinical heterogeneity that is not fully accounted for by pathologic features. Furthermore, real-time treatment modifications and detection of relapse are typically guided by radiographic imaging modalities which are imperfect. Here, we review the potential utility of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment for informing treatment decisions and detecting relapse. RECENT
findingsThe most promising method of MRD detection is based on analysis of circulating tumor DNA in the peripheral blood of patients with DLBCL. This approach can predict outcomes and response to treatment as well as detect relapse prior to clinical signs of recurrent disease. While some studies of MRD in DLBCL have been in the prospective setting, the ability of this technology to alter clinical outcomes is currently unknown. MRD detection provides a non-invasive way to gather information about DLBCL at various time points throughout the disease course. Its role is evolving and should be incorporated into prospective studies in order to demonstrate an impact on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.