ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2019
Application of differential mobility-mass spectrometry for untargeted human plasma metabolomic analysis.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between serum lipoprotein(a) and mildly reduced eGFR: a cross-sectional study.BMC nephrology · 2023Article
- Liquid chromatography and differential mobility spectrometry-data-independent mass spectrometry for comprehensive multidimensional separations in metabolomics.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Lipidomic approaches to dissect dysregulated lipid metabolism in kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022Review
- Recurrent Topics in Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics and Lipidomics-Standardization, Coverage, and Throughput.Analytical chemistry · 2021Review
- The New Omics Era into Systems Approaches: What Is the Importance of Separation Techniques?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) has been gaining popularity in small molecule analysis over the last few years due to its selectivity towards a variety of isomeric compounds. While DMS has been utilized in targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), its use in untargeted discovery workflows has not been systematically explored. In this contribution, we propose a novel workflow for untargeted metabolomics based solely on DMS separation in a clinically relevant chronic kidney disease (CKD) patient population. We analyzed ten plasma samples from early- and late-stage CKD patients. Peak finding, alignment, and filtering steps performed on the DMS-MS data yielded a list of 881 metabolic features (unique mass-to-charge and migration time combinations). Differential analysis by CKD patient group revealed three main features of interest. One of them was putatively identified as bilirubin based on high-accuracy MS data and comparison of its optimum compensation voltage (COV) with that of an authentic standard. The DMS-MS analysis was four times faster than a typical HPLC-MS run, which suggests a potential for the utilization of this technique in screening studies. However, its lower separation efficiency and reduced signal intensity make it less suitable for low-abundant features. Fewer features were detected by the DMS-based platform compared with an HPLC-MS-based approach, but importantly, the two approaches resulted in different features. This indicates a high degree of orthogonality between HPLC- and DMS-based approaches and demonstrates the need for larger studies comparing the two techniques. The workflow described here can be adapted for other areas of metabolomics and has a value as a prescreening method to develop semi-targeted workflows and as a faster alternative to HPLC in large biomedical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.