ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2019
[How do urological training residents experience the physician-patient conversation? : Promotion of communication competence in the context of medical residency training].
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [The KomMent study: a pilot project on structured interprofessional communication in uro-oncology].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Influence of using simulated or real patients on undergraduate medical students acquiring competencies in medical conversations in surgery: A prospective, controlled study.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- MatricS-A novel tool for monitoring professional role development in surgical disciplines.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- [Heal with words first : How successful communication advances the next generation of urologists].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn urological continuing education, communication as a training content has not yet been offered in a structured way. Communication skills are already expected in the first year of training. OBJECTIVES AND
methodsIn the period from November 2017 to June 2018, a descriptive, multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted to identify the factors that promote and inhibit patient-oriented communication from the point of view of continuing training assistants in subject-specific situations (as-is analysis). For this purpose, modified focus groups were carried out in six urological departments with a total of 37 participants. The results were checked in a questionnaire analysis in 62 urological training assistants.
resultsThe participants feel competent if they have sufficient specialist knowledge and experience, if it is a routine discussion situation and if they have sufficient time. They experience emotions, bad news and taboo topics as challenging. Facilitating factors are structural support at the workplace and support in the team. Aggravating factors are a lack of communication training, missing structures as well as a compression of the fields of work. They would personally benefit from mentoring, communication training and structured, interprofessional and interdisciplinary cooperation.
conclusionsThis needs analysis provides a basis for the conception and elaboration of a communication curriculum. In this way, the overriding goal of promoting communication competence in urological continuing education can be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30941476What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.