ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2019
[Autoimmune blistering dermatoses in children].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Autoimmune bullous dermatoses : Update on treatments and rare forms].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autoimmune blistering skin disorders represent a rare group of autoantibody-induced dermatoses against desmosomal and hemidesmosomal molecules. The common age of onset for pemphigus and pemphigoid, as well as dermatitis herpetiformis, encompasses the adult age, but all these disorders can be observed neonatally and/or during childhood. If the disease occurs postpartum or neonatally, physicians should consider transplacental transmission of pathogenic maternal immunoglobulin G (IgG)-autoantibodies, and both mother and child should be included in the diagnostic work up. If the disorder is suspected in childhood, early immunoserological testing and skin biopsies for direct immunofluorescence analyses are recommended for the correct diagnosis and subsequently for the right choice of treatment. First-line recommendations are nonhalogenated topical steroids, followed by oral dapsone. All therapies require preliminary examinations, e. g. enzyme-activity testing (as is glucose-6-phophate dehydrogenase in dapsone treatment). In refractory cases, further treatment choices like high-dose intravenous immunoglobins, plasmapheresis/immunoadsorption or targeted therapies like anti-CD20 autoantibody therapies are indicated. An intense dermatological support and good medical care are essential for an age-appropriate development of the child and to lower possible treatment-associated adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.