Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30941459›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2019

[Motivational interviewing : A possibility for doctor-patient communication in schizophrenia?]

Jens Reimer, Jens Kuhn, Rita Wietfeld, Wolfgang Janetzky, Karolina Leopold

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jens ReimerZentrum für Psychosoziale Medizin Gesundheit Nord, 28102, Bremen, Deutschland. jens.reimer@gesundheitnord.de.
Jens KuhnKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Johanniter Krankenhaus Oberhausen, Evangelischer Klinikverbund Niederrhein gGmbH, Oberhausen, Deutschland.
Rita WietfeldPsychotherapie, Praxis Neurologie und Psychiatrie, Witten, Deutschland.
Wolfgang JanetzkyScientific Unit, Lundbeck GmbH, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Karolina LeopoldPsychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivational interviewing (MI) has become established nowadays as an approach for a cooperative style of conversation to promote intrinsic motivation for change by exploring and resolving ambivalences. The change of addictive behavior is no longer sought by exerting pressure or lecturing/converting attempts of convincing or persuasion but by activating existing but "buried" or newly acquired self-motivation to change. The MI is now also used to change the treatment of other health-related behavior and chronic diseases, including schizophrenic disorders. Compared to the efficacy of MI in the addiction area, the data situation in schizophrenic patients is still insufficient. According to the available studies, MI can positively influence important aspects of disease-related impairments, such as medication adherence, the frequency and severity of psychotic relapses, the duration of hospitalization, the level of function, insight into the disease and cognitive rehabilitation. The practical implementation of MI requires a good knowledge of the method as well as changes in treatment principles and work processes.

Indexed as

Motivational InterviewingPhysician-Patient RelationsSchizophreniaCommunicationHumansMedication AdherenceMotivationCommunication strategyDoctor-patient communicationMedication adherenceMotivational InterviewingSchizophrenia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.