Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30941458›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2020

[Analysis of risk factors, etiology and treatment standard of lithium poisoning].

Robert Haußmann, Tobias Mudra, Cathrin Sauer, Simone von Bonin, Markus Donix, Michael Bauer, Ute Lewitzka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert HaußmannKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. robert.haussmann@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
Tobias MudraKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Cathrin SauerKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Simone von BoninKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Markus DonixKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Michael BauerKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Ute LewitzkaKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie · DETU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite unlimited access to therapeutic drug monitoring lithium poisoning is still a common and potentially life-threatening but in most cases preventable complication of lithium treatment; however, it is still considered to be the gold standard in the treatment of affective disorders. The necessity of drug monitoring and potential lithium toxicity substantiate the skepticism of many therapists with respect to this often very effective treatment. This therefore limits the use of lithium although the unique therapeutic effects and high efficiency are well known. This retrospective data analysis of risk factors and etiology of lithium poisoning cases identified 58 cases of lithium poisoning, which were treated internally in this hospital between 2010 and 2014. Of the patients 67.2% were female and the majority were classified as chronic poisoning (66.1%). The most relevant patient-related risk factor seemed to be insufficient self-management as 26% of cases of lithium poisoning occurred during febrile infections or exsiccosis. Regarding practitioner-related risk factors, an insufficient consideration of drug interactions, insufficient therapeutic drug monitoring after dose increase and a paucity of experience and knowledge concerning lithium treatment were most relevant. This study illustrates the most important risk factors for lithium poisoning and their frequencies and contributes to raise awareness for this highly relevant topic. These data can help to prevent further cases of lithium poisoning. Furthermore, the results enable a comparison between the actual treatment reality and currently available evidence for the treatment of lithium poisoning.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsLithium CompoundsChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsLithium CompoundsHemodialysisHemofiltrationLithium poisoningLithium treatmentRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID30941458
OpenAlexW2933559589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.