Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30941440›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Memory for non-painful auditory items is influenced by whether they are experienced in a context involving painful electrical stimulation.

Keith M Vogt, Caroline M Norton, Lauren E Speer, Joshua J Tremel, James W Ibinson, Lynne M Reder, Julie A Fiez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keith M VogtDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Keith.Vogt@Pitt.edu.
Caroline M NortonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lauren E SpeerDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Joshua J TremelDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
James W IbinsonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lynne M RederCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Julie A FiezCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
Research Training in Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineT32GM075770 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI YAN XU · 2007 to 2026
$4.8M
Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research MRTG--2-2017NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NIGMS NIH HHS L30 GM120759NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM075770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we sought to examine the effect of experimentally induced somatic pain on memory. Subjects heard a series of words and made categorization decisions in two different conditions. One condition included painful shocks administered just after presentation of some of the words; the other condition involved no shocks. For the condition that included painful stimulations, every other word was followed by a shock, and subjects were informed to expect this pattern. Word lists were repeated three times within each condition in randomized order, with different category judgments but consistent pain-word pairings. After a brief delay, recognition memory was assessed. Non-pain words from the pain condition were less strongly encoded than non-pain words from the completely pain-free condition. Recognition of pain-paired words was not significantly different than either subgroup of non-pain words. An important accompanying finding is that response times to repeated experimental items were slower for non-pain words from the pain condition, compared to non-pain words from the completely pain-free condition. This demonstrates that the effect of pain on memory may generalize to non-pain items experienced in the same experimental context.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultElectric StimulationFemaleHumansMaleMemoryMental RecallPainRandom AllocationReaction TimeYoung AdultElectric nerve stimulationFamiliarityMemoryPainRecollectionRemember-know

Identifiers

PMID30941440
PMCPMC6586482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.