Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30941270›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Comparative genomic analysis of the IDD genes in five Rosaceae species and expression analysis in Chinese white pear (

Xueqiang Su, Tiankai Meng, Yu Zhao, Guohui Li, Xi Cheng, Muhammad Abdullah, Xu Sun, Yongping Cai, Yi Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome-Wide Characterization of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Genome-wide analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genome-Wide Identification of the Highly ConservedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Comparative Genomic Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparative Genomic Analysis ofFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xueqiang Su *School of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Tiankai Meng *School of Life Sciences and Technology, TongJi University, Shanghai, China.
Yu ZhaoSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Guohui LiSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Xi ChengSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Muhammad AbdullahSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Xu SunSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Yongping CaiSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Yi LinSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Anhui Agricultural University · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The INDETERMINATE DOMAIN (IDD) gene family encodes hybrid transcription factors with distinct zinc finger motifs and appears to be found in all higher plant genomes. IDD genes have been identified throughout the genomes of the model plants

Indexed as

Chinese white pearINDETERMINATE DOMAIN (IDD) genesLignin synthesisMicrosyntenyPhylogenetic analysisSCW formation

Identifiers

PMID30941270
PMCPMC6440465
OpenAlexW2922690101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.