Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30941105›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2019

Mycotoxins in Conversation With Bacteria and Fungi.

Nandhitha Venkatesh, Nancy P Keller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Evaluation of Bacillus isolates as a biological control agents against soilborne phytopathogenic fungi.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Investigating Plasma-Activated Water (PAW) onFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mycology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Shifts inMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nandhitha VenkateshDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Nancy P KellerDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Funding

Comprehensive analysis of NRPS-derived metabolomes of three Aspergillus speciesR01GM112739 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KELLER, NANCY P · 2015 to 2023
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important goal of the mycotoxin research community is to develop comprehensive strategies for mycotoxin control and detoxification. Although significant progress has been made in devising such strategies, yet, there are barriers to overcome and gaps to fill in order to design effective mycotoxin management techniques. This is in part due to a lack of understanding of why fungi produce these toxic metabolites. Here we present cumulative evidence from the literature that indicates an important ecological role for mycotoxins, with particular focus on

Indexed as

bacterial-fungal interaction (BFI)microbial communicationmicrobial interactionmycotoxin ecological roleMycotoxins–Fusarium

Identifiers

PMID30941105
PMCPMC6433837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.