ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019
Dyadic Coping Across the Lifespan: A Comparison Between Younger and Middle-Aged Couples With Breast Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Relationship of Dyadic Coping With Emotional Functioning and Quality of the Relationship in Couples Facing Cancer-A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Pooled it
- Examining recruitment differences by race, ethnicity, and age to a decentralized trial of an internet-delivered intervention for sexual health after breast cancer: the WF-2202 SHINE trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Trial
- Disease-related communication difficulties and dyadic coping among patients with breast cancer and their spouses: An actor-partner interdependence model.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- The mediating role of perceived spousal support in the association between psychological crisis and psychological distress among breast cancer patients and their spouses: a longitudinal study based on an actor-partner interdependence mediation model with cross-lagged analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Navigating Romantic Relationships and Sexual Intimacy: Challenges and Opportunities for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer - A Literature Review of Qualitative Studies.Psycho-oncology · 2025Review
- Communication and Support-Focused Experiences and Needs of Young Adult Couples Coping With Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Psycho-oncology · 2025Article
- Spiritual Complexity in Palliative Home Care in Spain: A Multi-center Prospective Study.Journal of religion and health · 2025Article
- Disparities in Refusal of Adjuvant Radiation for Breast-Conserving Therapy in the USA.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Interactions among dyadic coping, self-efficacy, and negative emotions in Chinese parents of children with leukemia.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Patterns and predictors of post-traumatic growth and fear of disease progression in breast cancer patients: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of the Taking Care of Us Intervention for Couples Living With Heart Failure.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Effects of dyadic coping on post-traumatic growth in patients and couples with breast cancer: an analysis based on the actor-partner interdependence model.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Toward a new personalized psycho-social approach for the support of prostate cancer and their caregivers dyads: a pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Psychosocial Experiences, Challenges, and Recommendations for Care Delivery among Partners of Breast Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Social Wellbeing in Cancer Survivorship: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Self-Reported Relationship Closeness and Ambivalence from a Community Sample.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- The dyadic regulation approach of coping and illness representations in female cancer patients and their partners.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The experience of female oncological patients and fertility preservation: A phenomenology study.European journal of cancer care · 2022Article
- Article
- Active Engagement, Protective Buffering, and Depressive Symptoms in Young-Midlife Couples Surviving Cancer: The Roles of Age and Sex.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The association between dyadic coping and adjustment to cancer has been well-established. However, a significant gap in the literature is the understanding of how the life stage of couples may influence their dyadic coping and the accompanying quality of life. Although younger couples have been identified at higher risk for poor coping because of less collaborative behaviors and higher vulnerability to stress, only a limited number of studies have addressed younger women's coping with breast cancer in the context of close relationships. The present study addressed the differential impact of the illness on the quality of life and dyadic coping behaviors of younger and middle-aged dyads and the influence of relational mutuality on couples' coping in the two groups. A sample of 86 couples participated in a cross-sectional study; 35 younger couples were compared to 51 middle-aged dyads. Patients and partners completed measures of quality of life, dyadic coping, and mutuality. Independent-samples
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.