Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30941054›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2019

A Strategy for Classification of "Vaginal vs. Cesarean Section" Delivery: Bivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition of Cardiotocographic Recordings.

Saqib Saleem, Syed Saud Naqvi, Tareq Manzoor, Ahmed Saeed, Naveed Ur Rehman, Jawad Mirza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fetal Health Prediction From Cardiotocography Recordings Using Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saqib SaleemDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal, Pakistan.
Syed Saud NaqviDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Tareq ManzoorEnergy Research Center, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ahmed SaeedSchool of Computing, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom.
Naveed Ur RehmanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Jawad MirzaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose objective and robust measures for the purpose of classification of "vaginal vs. cesarean section" delivery by investigating temporal dynamics and complex interactions between fetal heart rate (FHR) and maternal uterine contraction (UC) recordings from cardiotocographic (CTG) traces. Multivariate extension of empirical mode decomposition (EMD) yields intrinsic scales embedded in UC-FHR recordings while also retaining inter-channel (UC-FHR) coupling at multiple scales. The mode alignment property of EMD results in the matched signal decomposition, in terms of frequency content, which paves the way for the selection of robust and objective time-frequency features for the problem at hand. Specifically, instantaneous amplitude and instantaneous frequency of multivariate intrinsic mode functions are utilized to construct a class of features which capture nonlinear and nonstationary interactions from UC-FHR recordings. The proposed features are fed to a variety of modern machine learning classifiers (decision tree, support vector machine, AdaBoost) to delineate vaginal and cesarean dynamics. We evaluate the performance of different classifiers on a real world dataset by investigating the following classifying measures: sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC) and mean squared error (MSE). It is observed that under the application of all proposed 40 features AdaBoost classifier provides the best accuracy of 91.8% sensitivity, 95.5% specificity, 98% AUC, and 5% MSE. To conclude, the utilization of all proposed time-frequency features as input to machine learning classifiers can benefit clinical obstetric practitioners through a robust and automatic approach for the classification of fetus dynamics.

Indexed as

bivariate empirical mode decompositioncesarean sectionfetal heart rateintrinsic mode functionuterine contractionvaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID30941054
PMCPMC6433745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.