Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30940857›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Somatosensory-guided tool use modifies arm representation for action.

M Martel, L Cardinali, G Bertonati, C Jouffrais, L Finos, A Farnè, A C Roy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Embodiment for Robotic Lower-Limb Exoskeletons: A Narrative Review.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

M MartelLaboratoire Dynamique du Langage, CNRS UMR 5596, University Lyon 2, Lyon, France. marie.martel@uni-bielefeld.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4213-7713
L CardinaliThe Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
G BertonatiLaboratoire Dynamique du Langage, CNRS UMR 5596, University Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
C JouffraisIRIT, CNRS, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-1019
L FinosDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialisation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
A FarnèUniversity of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5769-3491
A C RoyLaboratoire Dynamique du Langage, CNRS UMR 5596, University Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Padua · ITWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tool-use changes both peripersonal space and body representations, with several effects being nowadays termed tool embodiment. Since somatosensation was typically accompanied by vision in most previous tool use studies, whether somatosensation alone is sufficient for tool embodiment remains unknown. Here we address this question via a task assessing arm length representation at an implicit level. Namely, we compared movement's kinematics in blindfolded healthy participants when grasping an object before and after tool-use. Results showed longer latencies and smaller peaks in the arm transport component after tool-use, consistent with an increased length of arm representation. No changes were found in the hand grip component and correlations revealed similar kinematic signatures in naturally long-armed participants. Kinematics changes did not interact with target object position, further corroborating the finding that somatosensory-guided tool use may increase the represented size of the participants' arm. Control experiments ruled out alternative interpretations based upon altered hand position sense. In addition, our findings indicate that tool-use effects are specific for the implicit level of arm representation, as no effect was observed on the explicit estimate of the forearm length. These findings demonstrate for the first time that somatosensation is sufficient for incorporating a tool that has never been seen, nor used before.

Indexed as

AdultArmBiomechanical PhenomenaBody ImageEquipment and SuppliesFemaleHand StrengthHumansMalePersonal SpacePsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30940857
PMCPMC6445103
OpenAlexW2934031659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.