Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30940833›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2019

A prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response relationship study to investigate efficacy of fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) on human gut microflora.

Disha Tandon, Mohammed Monzoorul Haque, Manoj Gote, Manish Jain, Anirban Bhaduri, Ashok Kumar Dubey, Sharmila S Mande

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Improving Growth Dynamics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Disha TandonBio-Sciences R&D Division, TCS Research, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., 54-B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Pune, 411 013, Maharashtra, India.
Mohammed Monzoorul HaqueBio-Sciences R&D Division, TCS Research, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., 54-B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Pune, 411 013, Maharashtra, India.
Manoj GoteTata Chemicals Ltd. Innovation Centre, Survey Number 315, Hissa Number 1-14, Ambedveth, Mulshi, Pune, 412 111, Maharashtra, India.
Manish JainTata Chemicals Ltd. Innovation Centre, Survey Number 315, Hissa Number 1-14, Ambedveth, Mulshi, Pune, 412 111, Maharashtra, India.
Anirban BhaduriTata Chemicals Ltd. Innovation Centre, Survey Number 315, Hissa Number 1-14, Ambedveth, Mulshi, Pune, 412 111, Maharashtra, India.
Ashok Kumar DubeyTata Chemicals Ltd. Innovation Centre, Survey Number 315, Hissa Number 1-14, Ambedveth, Mulshi, Pune, 412 111, Maharashtra, India. adubey@tatachemicals.com.
Sharmila S MandeBio-Sciences R&D Division, TCS Research, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., 54-B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Pune, 411 013, Maharashtra, India. sharmila.mande@tcs.com.
Tata Chemicals (India) · INTata Consultancy Services (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), a prebiotic supplement, is known for its Bifidogenic capabilities. However, aspects such as effect of variable quantities of FOS intake on gut microbiota, and temporal dynamics of gut microbiota (transitioning through basal, dosage, and follow-up phases) has not been studied in detail. This study investigated these aspects through a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response relationship study. The study involved 80 participants being administered FOS at three dose levels (2.5, 5, and 10 g/day) or placebo (Maltodextrin 10 g/day) during dosage phase. Microbial DNA extracted from fecal samples collected at 9 intervening time-points was sequenced and analysed. Results indicate that FOS consumption increased the relative abundance of OTUs belonging to Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. Interestingly, higher FOS dosage appears to promote, in contrast to Maltodextrin, the selective proliferation of OTUs belonging to Lactobacillus. While consumption of prebiotics increased bacterial diversity, withdrawal led to its reduction. Apart from probiotic bacteria, a significant change was also observed in certain butyrate-producing microbes like Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus and Oscillospira. The positive impact of FOS on butyrate-producing bacteria and FOS-mediated increased bacterial diversity reinforces the role of prebiotics in conferring beneficial functions to the host.

Indexed as

AdultBacteriaDNA, BacterialDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFecesFemaleFructoseGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMaleOligosaccharidesPhylogenyPrebioticsProspective StudiesSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialFructoseOligosaccharidesPrebiotics

Identifiers

PMID30940833
PMCPMC6445088
OpenAlexW2930454936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.