ArticleBMJ open2019
Achieving integrated care through commissioning of primary care services in the English NHS: a qualitative analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers to and facilitators of coalface primary care reform in England: a qualitative study.BJGP open · 2026Article
- Transforming the Indian Private Sector for Universal Health Coverage.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrated care in practice: lessons from three tiers of healthcare provider and commissioner staff in two London Integrated Care Systems.BJPsych open · 2025Article
- Does capitation payment influence healthcare service behavior in county medical community? Evidence from patients with diabetes in rural China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Developing Primary Health Network Employee's Capability in Health and Social Care Commissioning.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Article
- Building Health Commissioning Capability of Australia's Primary Health Networks -Service Providers' Perspective.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Article
- Primary care services in the English NHS: are they a thorn in the side of integrated care systems? A qualitative analysis.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Article
- Primary care engagement in health system change: a scoping review of common barriers and effective strategies.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- The usage of data in NHS primary care commissioning: a realist review.BMC medicine · 2023Review
- Exploring commissioners' understandings of early primary care network development: qualitative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021Article
- Article
- Effectiveness of the integrated care model Salut+Social in patients with chronic conditions: A mixed methods study protocol.Medicine · 2020Article
- Lessons learnt from the implementation of new care models in the NHS: a qualitative study of the North East Vanguards programme.BMJ open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSince April 2015, Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) have taken on the responsibility to commission primary care services. The aim of this paper is to analyse how CCGs have responded to this new responsibility and to identify challenges and factors that facilitated or inhibited achievement of integrated care systems.
designWe undertook an exploratory approach, combining data from interviews and national telephone surveys, with analysis of policy documents and case studies in four CCGs. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. SETTING/
participantsWe reviewed 147 CCG application documents and conducted two national telephone surveys with CCGs (n=49 and n=21). We interviewed 6 senior policymakers and 42 CCG staff who were involved in primary care co-commissioning (general practitioners and managers). We observed 74 primary care commissioning committee meetings and their subgroups (approx. 111 hours).
resultsCCGs in our case studies focused their primary care commissioning activities on developing strategic plans, 'new' primary care initiatives, and dealing with legacy work. Many plans focused on incentivising and supporting practices to work together and provide a broad range of services. There was a clear focus on ensuring the sustainability of general practice. Our respondents expressed mixed views as to what new collaborative service models, such as the new models of care and sustainability and transformation partnerships (STPs), would mean for the future of primary care and the impact they could have on CCGs and their members.
conclusionsThere is a disconnect between locally based primary care and the wider system. One of the major challenges we identified is the lack of knowledge and expertise in the field of primary care at STP level. While primary care commissioning by CCGs seems to be supporting local collaborations between practices, there is some way to go before this is translated into broader integration initiatives across wider footprints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.