Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30940750›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Daisy-chain gene drives for the alteration of local populations.

Charleston Noble, John Min, Jason Olejarz, Joanna Buchthal, Alejandro Chavez, Andrea L Smidler, Erika A DeBenedictis, George M Church, Martin A Nowak, Kevin M Esvelt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Field Trials Need Genetic Localization, Not Geographic Isolation.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genes drive organisms and slippery slopes.Pathogens and global health · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Charleston NobleProgram for Evolutionary Dynamics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
John MinDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Jason OlejarzProgram for Evolutionary Dynamics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Joanna BuchthalMedia Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Alejandro ChavezDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Andrea L SmidlerDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.
Erika A DeBenedictisMedia Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
George M ChurchDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; esvelt@mit.edu gchurch@genetics.med.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3535-2076
Martin A NowakProgram for Evolutionary Dynamics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.ORCID 0000-0001-5489-0908
Kevin M EsveltMedia Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; esvelt@mit.edu gchurch@genetics.med.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8797-3945

Funding

Sculpting the Enteric Microbiota with CRISPR-Cas SystemsR00DK102669 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ESVELT, KEVIN · 2016 to 2017
$496k
NIDDK NIH HHS R00 DK102669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If they are able to spread in wild populations, CRISPR-based gene-drive elements would provide new ways to address ecological problems by altering the traits of wild organisms, but the potential for uncontrolled spread tremendously complicates ethical development and use. Here, we detail a self-exhausting form of CRISPR-based drive system comprising genetic elements arranged in a daisy chain such that each drives the next. "Daisy-drive" systems can locally duplicate any effect achievable by using an equivalent self-propagating drive system, but their capacity to spread is limited by the successive loss of nondriving elements from one end of the chain. Releasing daisy-drive organisms constituting a small fraction of the local wild population can drive a useful genetic element nearly to local fixation for a wide range of fitness parameters without self-propagating spread. We additionally report numerous highly active guide RNA sequences sharing minimal homology that may enable evolutionarily stable daisy drive as well as self-propagating CRISPR-based gene drive. Especially when combined with threshold dependence, daisy drives could simplify decision-making and promote ethical use by enabling local communities to decide whether, when, and how to alter local ecosystems.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesCRISPR-Cas SystemsEcologyFemaleGene Drive TechnologyGenetic EngineeringHEK293 CellsHumansMalariaMaleOrganisms, Genetically ModifiedRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPRecological engineeringevolutionary dynamicsevolutionary geneticsgene drive

Identifiers

PMID30940750
PMCPMC6486765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.